(National Post-Canada) Irwin Cotler - The Palestinian initiative, bypassing direct negotiations, may well undermine rather than advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, while constituting a standing affront to the UN, international agreements and international law. First, such a unilateral Palestinian resolution would undermine existing and accepted international frameworks for peace, such as UN Security Council resolutions 242, 338, and 1850; the Roadmap for Peace; and various statements by the Quartet which reject unilateralism. Second, it violates existing Israeli-Palestinian bilateral agreements, most notably the Oslo II agreements of September 28, 1995, which state that "neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the Permanent Status negotiations" (Article 31). Third, the Israeli-Palestinian bilateral Interim Agreement was witnessed by the UN itself together with the EU, the Russian Federation, the U.S., Egypt and Norway. Accordingly, it would be highly inappropriate for such witnesses to now authorize a UN measure that would effectively violate this agreement. Fourth, the Palestinian resolution and UN General Assembly vote might well unravel the institutionalized legal and administrative framework that underpins existing Israeli-Palestinian relations. Fifth, if UN General Assembly recognition takes place while Hamas is the ongoing authority in Gaza, it would effectively amount to recognition of Hamas itself. Yet Hamas is defined as a terrorist organization by Canada, the U.S. and European countries. Sixth, the Palestinian resolution purports to presuppose, and prejudge, the outcome of negotiations on such critical issues as borders and the status of Jerusalem, which were to be decided in direct negotiations between the parties. The writer is a former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada.
2012-12-03 00:00:00Full ArticleBACK Visit the Daily Alert Archive