| DAILY ALERT |
Tuesday, June 16, 2026 |
|
News Resources - North America, Europe, and Asia:
The U.S. and Iran reached a limited deal on Sunday to end months of fighting, according to President Trump, a top Iranian diplomat and the leader of Pakistan. Trump said Sunday on Truth Social that he had agreed to end the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports in exchange for Iran's reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. The two sides are scheduled to sign the agreement on Friday in Switzerland, and plan to keep discussing the limits to Iran's nuclear program that Trump has sought. Neither side released the text of what they had agreed to. (Washington Post) See also CIA Director Doubts Iran's Intentions on Deal - Barak Ravid CIA Director John Ratcliffe told President Trump and other senior officials that evidence gathered by U.S. intelligence agencies raises serious doubts about Iran's willingness to make the nuclear concessions the U.S. is seeking in any final deal, according to three sources. (Axios) Iran on Monday declared it had won "great victories" over the U.S. after an agreement to end the conflict, with Iranian officials portraying the deal as a military and political triumph rather than a diplomatic compromise. "The enemy that had attacked to carry out its evil aims was defeated in all its aims," said Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi. Iranian state television, IRIB, framed the ceasefire as a result of military pressure exerted by Tehran, saying Iranian forces had imposed their "divine and iron will" on the "American and Zionist enemies." Iran's adversaries had "no path other than accepting defeat and surrender." IRGC Deputy Commander for Political Affairs Brig.-Gen. Yadollah Javani told Fars News, "The Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic are ready to respond to any act of mischief with their eyes open and fingers on the trigger." He said Iran's retaliatory operations and its leverage over the Strait of Hormuz had forced its adversaries to halt military operations, and that Iran had emerged from the conflict stronger than before. (Arab News-Saudi Arabia) See also Houthi Officials Say: The U.S. Has Been Brought to Its Knees (MEMRI) U.S. Vice President JD Vance told CNBC on Monday: "The agreement is fundamentally built around a two-step verification process. We say to the Iranians, you are welcome to have access to an unsanctioned economy, you're welcome to be re-invited into the world economy, but only if you honor the commitments that you make in this agreement. So that's the leverage point, and simultaneously, the enforcement mechanism we have over their nuclear program." "We have affirmatively and comprehensively destroyed their nuclear program from what we've done over the last year and a half." This agreement says "to the Iranians that you don't have access to the money to rebuild that nuclear program, but if you're willing to give up that program long-term, if you're willing to accept the inspections and verification regime that's necessary to give us the confidence you're never going to have a nuclear weapon, then we want you to be a prosperous country and we will re-invite you into the community of nations." If "they don't give up that ambition, they're never going to have the resources to rebuild it from where it is today." (CNBC) Israel waged two wars against Iran in the past year. Now Israel, which had not been a party to the Trump administration's negotiations with Iran, is being left out of the potential peace. An Israeli briefed on the deal with Iran listed Israel's main problems with the proposal: There are no clear answers regarding the treatment of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, and not enough curbs on Iran's nuclear program. Instead of creating the conditions for the collapse of the Iranian government, the deal would allow funds to start flowing back into its coffers. The deal lays out no clear mechanism for forcing Iran to halt its support for its proxy forces. But it would mean the suspension of Israel's campaign against Hizbullah in Lebanon. The latest round of fighting in Lebanon erupted after Hizbullah fired at Israel days after the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran began in late February. Israel has sought to prevent any direct link between a deal with Iran and its military campaign against Hizbullah, noting that the militants are on its doorstep. (New York Times) German investigators believe the procurement of weapons for Hamas was linked to concrete plans for an attack in Europe, Germany's top federal prosecutor said on Monday. "A pre-produced video claiming responsibility was seized from one of the suspects," Federal Attorney General Jens Rommel said, referring to nine suspected Hamas supporters arrested last year. They are accused of involvement in the transport and storage of weapons and ammunition for Hamas since at least mid-2025. The video announced an attack on the second anniversary of Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, assault on Israel, pointing to a planned operation on Oct. 7, 2025. Federal prosecutors arrested the first three suspects in the case on Oct. 1, 2025. (DPA) The UK Home Office decision to ban Palestine Action under anti-terror laws was lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled. The government launched the appeal in February immediately after three High Court judges ruled that the decision was "disproportionate." The ban, which began on July 5, 2025, made membership of, or support for, the direct-action group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Since the ban, more than 3,000 people have been arrested for supporting Palestine Action and more than 200 have been charged with terrorism offenses. Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, insisted there was a clear distinction between protesting against Israel's actions in Gaza and supporting Palestine Action. "The court has found that Palestine Action has carried out acts of terrorism, celebrated those who have taken part in those acts and promoted the use of violence. It is not an ordinary protest or civil disobedience group, and its actions are not consistent with democratic values and the rule of law." (The Times-UK) News Resources - Israel and the Mideast:
Prime Minister Netanyahu told President Trump that Israel does not consider itself bound by the Lebanon clause in the emerging agreement with Iran, Israeli officials said, making clear that Jerusalem will not accept any arrangement that limits its freedom to act against Hizbullah. Israeli officials said the IDF will remain in the positions it currently holds and will continue operating to foil threats from Hizbullah, including destroying terror infrastructure and responding to any attack on Israel. Netanyahu received full backing in the Israeli cabinet for his position. Israel says it must retain freedom to strike Hizbullah targets in order to protect northern communities and prevent the group from rebuilding its forces near the border. One Israeli official said the Americans understand that Israel views the Lebanon issue as a nonstarter. (Ynet News) See also U.S. Official: IDF Withdrawal from Lebanon Not Part of Iran Deal - Jacob Magid On Monday, a U.S. official told reporters that the Iran deal was not conditioned on Israel withdrawing from Lebanese territory, but nevertheless envisioned a ceasefire that covers both Iran and Lebanon. "The deal is a ceasefire, but it will not be a one-way ceasefire. If Iran is not able to control Hizbullah, and if they attack Israeli positions or Israeli towns, Israel will have the right to defend themselves and respond," the official said. (Times of Israel) Fighting between Israel and Hizbullah in Lebanon eased but did not halt entirely on Monday after the U.S. signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran. The IDF said Hizbullah had fired several rockets at Israeli troops in southern Lebanon, as well as an anti-tank missile and several mortars. The IDF also confirmed striking Hizbullah operatives who "posed a threat" to its forces. (Times of Israel) Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Monday: "The IDF will remain in the security zones in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza - indefinitely - to protect the border and Israeli communities from jihadist elements....This is the main lesson from the events of Oct. 7." "We oppose the IDF's withdrawal from Lebanon - despite all the existing pressures and those that will come. Netanyahu made this clear to U.S. President Trump and other senior American officials, and I also clarified this yesterday to U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth." (Ynet News) See also Israel Must Retain Freedom to Strike Iran to Stop Nuclear Program - Lazar Berman Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Friday: "Israel must ensure that, in the future as well, we retain the ability to act independently to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and I have instructed the IDF to prepare accordingly." (Times of Israel) U.S. President Donald Trump is "normalizing fire at Israel," an Israeli official said on Sunday, as Washington pressed Israel to avoid responding if Iran launches missiles in retaliation for an Israeli strike in Beirut. The IDF struck in Beirut's Dahieh district after Hizbullah launched drones toward Israel. Trump described the Hizbullah attack as "very small and meaningless" because no one was hurt. Israeli officials said the U.S. position was unfair and did not reflect the way an ally should be treated. They said Washington was ignoring repeated Hizbullah violations of Israeli sovereignty and tying Israel's hands in the face of ongoing fire. Officials in Jerusalem said Trump had demanded that Netanyahu not only halt fire in Lebanon but also begin a withdrawal. Netanyahu rejected the demands. Israel also pushed back against U.S. claims that the Dahieh strike was intended to disrupt a pending agreement with Iran. Israeli officials said drones fired into Israel reached near the western Galilee community of Shlomi. An Israeli official noted that "when the Iranians downed an American helicopter, Trump ordered a harsh response even though there were no casualties." (Ynet News) Senior Hizbullah commander Ali Mussa Daqduq, mastermind of a January 2007 kidnapping and murder of five American soldiers in Iraq, was killed in an Israeli strike in southern Lebanon on Friday, the IDF announced Sunday. U.S. forces jailed Daqduq in 2007 and handed him over to Iraq in 2011, which assured the U.S. he would be prosecuted, but Iraq acquitted Daqduq and released him in 2012. Daqduq "played a central role in advancing terrorist attacks and combat operations against the State of Israel and IDF soldiers," the IDF said. He commanded a terrorist cell responsible for Hizbullah's entrenchment in Syria and the establishment of military infrastructure near the Israeli border. Over the past several years, he led much of Hizbullah's operational planning against IDF soldiers. (Times of Israel) Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis:
Iran Any deal with Iran is worse than the alternatives, because it establishes the legitimacy of the extremist regime and gives it survival, hope, and resources for rehabilitation. Opening the Strait of Hormuz to Iranian oil exports will allow Tehran to earn millions every day. Added to that are the billions expected to flow to Iran once the memorandum of understanding enters into force. Including the Lebanese front in the framework of the deal is a gift to Iran. Not only will it ensure a space of immunity for Hizbullah, but it will also gain recognition of its status as a player in the Lebanese front. If the expectation was to dismantle Iran's hold over its proxies, this agreement actually tightens it. The U.S. is paying Iran in cash and receiving in return a postdated check whose details are unclear and whose coverage is doubtful. The nuclear issues will be discussed only at a later stage, when the regime is no longer in distress and when the effectiveness of U.S. levers of military and economic pressure will be lower. Tehran will not rush to reach understandings on the nuclear issues. Washington's conduct surrounding the agreement will project weakness and affect the U.S.'s standing in the Middle East. Israel is not a party to the deal. It will do what is necessary to defend its security on all fronts. It does not need to poke Trump in the eye, argue with him, or defy him. As IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir put it, our actions will speak. The writer, head of the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Strategy, served as Israel's National Security Council head during 2017-2021. (Israel Hayom) A memorandum of understanding that consists only of meaningless Iranian declarations renouncing nuclear weapons while providing sanctions relief, financial resources, a partial solution to the Hormuz issue, and postponing all other critical matters to future negotiations would be a catastrophic mistake, and a deal it would have been better not to reach at all. Linking this memorandum to the developments in Lebanon would be highly problematic. I am convinced that Prime Minister Netanyahu has made it clear to President Trump that Israel will not accept any such commitment. Following the military campaign's success and Iran's unprecedented weakness, the U.S. should have continued its maximum-pressure campaign in Hormuz, expanded the naval blockade with an aerial component, and conducted extensive strikes against the regime's main interests, while simultaneously holding discussions regarding a future settlement. Only sustained and credible military pressure, combined with an intensified blockade, may persuade the Iranian leadership to alter its behavior. The writer served as National Security Advisor to Prime Minister Netanyahu and as head of Israel's National Security Council. (Jerusalem Post) The understandings reached between the U.S. and Iran are not a historic agreement and certainly not a new nuclear deal. They are mainly an American attempt to stop a war that Trump no longer wanted. The president needed an exit. Now he is presenting it as a victory. But most of the difficult issues have not been resolved. The nuclear program has not been dismantled. The fate of the enriched uranium remains disputed. Oversight is unclear. The 60-day negotiation window that is now supposed to open does not guarantee a breakthrough. It is more likely to become a mechanism for delay and buying time. Trump, having already declared success, will find it difficult to quickly return to a full-scale war. The more likely scenario is prolonged management of indecision. Israel emerges from this campaign stronger militarily, but more constrained diplomatically. It proved its ability to strike Iran and operate alongside the U.S., but it also learned that Washington decides when to stop, what counts as victory, and how much Israel will be able to keep operating the day after. Israel sought a decision. Trump sought a victory image. That gap erupted around the Israeli strike in Dahieh. From Israel's perspective, it was part of the ongoing campaign against Hizbullah. From Trump's perspective, it was almost an act of sabotage against his diplomatic move. Regional states will not rush to conclude that Iran is out of the game. They saw that the U.S. knows how to apply tremendous military force, but is not built, politically or economically, to conduct a prolonged war until full victory over Iran. Many of them will return to maintaining channels with Tehran, understanding that, even after a severe blow, Iran remains a player that cannot be ignored. Israel's main concern now is freedom of action. Any Israeli operation against Iranian facilities, senior officials or strategic assets could be seen in Washington as an attempt to torpedo the agreement Trump is presenting as a personal achievement. In Lebanon, Israel may retain greater room to maneuver. But any significant strike in Dahieh or against Hizbullah will be examined through one question: Does it endanger the understandings with Iran? The writer, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, previously served in senior roles in Israeli Defense Intelligence and the Mossad. (Ynet News) On Sunday, President Donald Trump announced a framework agreement with Iran to end the 15-week conflict. The agreement represents a dramatic shift in the Middle East's strategic balance. Iran stood up to the world's strongest power and emerged with an agreement enhancing its regional influence across the Persian Gulf. Gulf states, clear American allies, now understand that Iranian bullying ultimately pays off. They are paying the price in cash through extortion, threats, and only partial American protection. They have also internalized another lesson: there is only one country capable of effectively confronting Iran - Israel. Beijing has drawn a clear lesson from the Iran episode: the U.S. does not necessarily have to be defeated on the battlefield. It can be pressured, and in some cases strategically outmaneuvered, through economic leverage. Europeans and Japanese are rushing to align with the agreement. Europe continues to believe that money and economic concessions will protect it from Iranian terror. The U.S. is working to dismantle Hizbullah in Lebanon, while at the same time the agreement grants it a significant lifeline through Iranian rehabilitation. The deal projects American weakness that encourages Iran's proxies to recover and strengthen. For Israel, the Shiite axis has been weakened but not defeated. Tehran has historically viewed ceasefires as opportunities to rearm, reorganize, and prepare for the next confrontation. If it uses the coming months to rebuild its missile arsenal, advance its nuclear ambitions, or strengthen its proxy network, Israel will act again - alone if necessary. This is another pause in a long and exhausting war. Iranian intentions remain unchanged and the challenge posed by Iran remains unfinished. The writer is CEO and director of communications at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs. (Algemeiner) To reopen the Strait of Hormuz, President Trump is accepting Iran's promises merely to negotiate over its nuclear program. Mr. Trump's willingness to use military force when no one else would has set back Iran's nuclear program, military and industrial base. The result isn't "Obama deal 2.0" because, unlike in 2015, Iran's key nuclear facilities are in rubble and its enrichment of uranium has been halted for the first time in 20 years. Those who say Trump had no alternative ignore that the U.S. blockade was squeezing Iran more by the day, while Iran's blockade was leaking. The memorandum of understanding would defer most matters of the nuclear program to 60 more days of talks, with oil and other sanctions relief along the way in exchange for diplomatic progress. This linkage is crucial, but pushing off the most difficult nuclear issues in talks with "dishonorable people" who don't deal "in good faith," as the President called them on Friday, doesn't inspire confidence. If the regime won't agree to dismantle its nuclear program now, why would it do so after weeks of oil exports and other relief? Iran's new leaders are likely to conclude that Mr. Trump has no desire for more conflict, and they will negotiate accordingly. Congress should scrutinize any final agreement made with Iran - and reject it if it props up a regime that still says "death to America." (Wall Street Journal) The American agreement with Iran completely abandons the Iranian people. In December and January, Iranians took to the streets in huge numbers in 200 cities. The regime responded with mass murder, shooting unarmed demonstrators and killing between 7,000 and 35,000. On June 13, President Trump posted: "We look forward to working with Iran." When he announced the deal with Iran the next day, Trump said, "I never cared about regime change. This is the third group we've dealt with, and this is the most rational group yet." This is a strategic error of the greatest importance. It's obvious to Iranians, and should be to us, that the Islamic Republic is unreformable. Iran's rulers are the people who murdered thousands of their fellow citizens in cold blood a few months ago and more recently struck at economic and civilian targets of all their Gulf Arab neighbors as well as Israel. The only long-run solution to Iran's aggression and repression is popular sovereignty. The new agreement will not change the Middle East because the Islamic Republic will always remain at the heart of the region's violence and instability. Its ruling elites have shown again and again that "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" are central pillars of their belief system. The writer, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, served as White House deputy national security advisor, where he supervised U.S. policy in the Middle East. (National Review) The vast majority of top IDF and Mossad officials oppose the emerging Iran nuclear deal as insufficient in light of the "blood and treasure" invested and the threats confronting Israel, the Jerusalem Post has learned. The IDF and Mossad had hoped for progress on the issues of ballistic missiles and terrorist proxies, which they have had to deal with on a daily basis for years, but these issues have been left out of the deal. Many senior Mossad officials and some IDF officers believe it is important to keep Iran under sanctions until the regime stops threatening Israel or until it is toppled. Some believe the Iranian regime likely would fall within the year if financial sanctions pressure remains. But with billions expected to stream to the regime, any prospect of regime change could be delayed. (Jerusalem Post) The framework announced Sunday is an intermediate step - one that could ultimately prove a dismal failure. In diplomatic terms, this agreement is an exit ramp from a costly and unpopular war, not a victory parade. There are more question marks than answers: The details of limiting Tehran's nuclear program haven't been negotiated yet. The Strait of Hormuz is reopening, but perhaps only temporarily. The agreement seems to apply to Lebanon, but that doesn't mean Israel or Hizbullah will abide by it. And most worrying of all, the regime remains in power in Tehran, able to threaten its Arab neighbors and Israel. Iran's leaders are the hardest of the hard-liners. They have survived Israeli bombs and assassination attempts. Many are religious devotees who despise the West and its values. They're interested in revenge. (Washington Post) Iran's rulers have seen off a U.S. military campaign but their real problems may be about to begin: managing the demands of an impoverished, angry people. Iran's hardliners are energized by a three-month confrontation they feel Iran has won. They want to prioritize rearming, confident they can halt any internal dissent with force. Four Iranian officials and one former official described the pressures now facing the Islamic Republic as its population turns from war to survey the ruins of their economy. Three officials said there was a public expectation that any financial relief would be used to boost the economy and improve people's lives. A senior official described Iranians as "weary of war and economic hardship." Iran's economy faces very high inflation, a tumbling currency, widespread unemployment, and massive damage to industry and infrastructure that will be very expensive to fix. (Reuters) Israeli Security Iran, Hizbullah, and Hamas have all been significantly weakened since Oct. 7, former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer said Monday. He said that while he had heard "many fears and concerns" about a U.S. agreement with Iran, Israel should "take a step back" and assess the current strategic picture. "Two and a half years ago, Iran posed an existential threat to Israel. Three years later, Iran's nuclear capability has been destroyed" and its ballistic capabilities had been set back by years. That gives Israel time to strengthen its defenses. "Within two or three weeks, we will know whether the Iranians are prepared to give up their nuclear program," he added. "I doubt that will happen." "Hizbullah is maybe 25% of what it was before," he said, although it still retains military capabilities. He said defeating Hizbullah outright would require a force twice the size of the IDF, but stressed that Israel would not allow a terrorist organization to threaten its borders. Prime Minister Netanyahu has made clear that Israel will have to act to prevent Hizbullah from rebuilding, Dermer said, adding that the Trump administration understands Israel's position. (Jerusalem Post) Much of the Jewish world expresses Jewish identity through a fierce commitment to the Jewish people and Israel, the most eloquent expression of Jewish peoplehood in our times. We cannot succumb to those who preach a false philosophy of Jewish universalism under the guise of a sweeping, self-righteous, sanctimonious and suffocating misunderstanding of tikkun olam - "repairing the world." Isn't defending Israel and the Jewish people also tikkun olam? The reaction to Oct. 7, and every day since, revealed the rot inside our most cherished Western institutions. Increasingly we are living a surreal reality. More Jews are massacred in one day than on any day since the Holocaust, and immediately protests erupt against Jews. Israel is accused of genocide, while the genocidal forces that launched this war are forgiven or forgotten. The writer, senior rabbi of Stephen Wise Free Synagogue in New York City, served as executive director of the Association of Reform Zionists of America. (Times of Israel) Palestinian Arabs Nearly three years after the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel, many Western governments and diplomats remain trapped in a dangerous fantasy: the belief that creating a Palestinian state will bring peace to the Middle East. France is hosting an international conference in Paris this month to revive the two-state solution and promote the establishment of a Palestinian state. The conference is detached from reality. Why would any country allow a barbaric, homicidal state, committed to its destruction, anywhere near it, let alone on its border? Would France welcome al-Qaeda or Islamic State on its border? It is astonishing that after Oct. 7, anyone can still argue that a Palestinian state would enhance peace and security under current circumstances. The opposite is true. Such a hostile state, dedicated to Israel's destruction, would pose an existential threat to its neighbor. Perhaps the actual wish is to help the Palestinians "finish the job." Gaza already served as a test case for Palestinian self-rule. After Israel removed every soldier and Jewish civilian from Gaza in 2005, Palestinians received an opportunity to build foundations of a future state. Instead, Hamas seized control in 2007 and transformed it into a base for jihad (holy war) against Israel. Billions of dollars in international aid flowed into Gaza. Much of the money was diverted to creating a military infrastructure designed for one purpose: the destruction of Israel. Why should anyone believe that a Palestinian state in the West Bank would be any different? Palestinian leaders have failed to prepare Palestinians for peaceful coexistence with Israel. They continue to pay and glorify terrorists, incite hatred, and teach generations of Palestinians that Israel has no right to exist. (Gatestone Institute) Observations: President Trump Wants to Calm Things Down until the U.S. Midterm Elections - Paul Nuki (Telegraph-UK)
|
|