Prepared for the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in association with Access/Middle East by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
| |||||
To contact the Presidents Conference: [email protected]
In-Depth Issue:
U.S. & Israeli Sources: Half of Hamas's Budget Comes from Saudis - Don Van Natta, Jr. with Timothy L. O'Brien (New York Times)
New Terrorist Concern in U.S. - Lisa Myers
(NBC News)
Syria Obtains SA-18 Missiles (Middle East Newsline) |
News Resources - North America and Europe:
The U.S. Tuesday vetoed a Security Council resolution, backed by Islamic and nonaligned nations, demanding that Israel back off its threat to deport Arafat. Eleven Council members voted in favor of the measure, while Britain, Germany, and Bulgaria abstained. U.S. UN Ambassador John Negroponte said the resolution failed to include "a robust condemnation of acts of terrorism; an explicit condemnation of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Aksa Martyrs Brigades as organizations responsible for acts of terrorism; and a call for the dismantlement of infrastructure, which supports these terror operations." Israeli UN Ambassador Dan Gillerman said after the vote, "This was a resolution which in a very macabre way criticized the victims of terror rather than the perpetrators of terror." (New York Times) Sixteen of the 24 ministers in Palestinian premier-designate Ahmed Qurei's new cabinet will be appointed by Fatah councils controlled by Arafat, officials said Monday, though Israel has said it will have nothing to do with an Arafat-dominated government. (AP/Washington Post) The U.S. Congress has begun examining proposed legislation that accuses Damascus of supporting terrorism and developing weapons of mass destruction, and condemns its military presence in Lebanon. Known as the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act, the legislation would require Damascus to change its behavior or face American sanctions. (BBC News) News Resources - Israel, the Mideast, and Asia:
A meeting of the Israeli Cabinet to approve the route of an additional section of the security fence has been cancelled due to American pressure. American emissary John Wolf warned Defense Ministry Director General Amos Yaron Tuesday that if Israel approves the section of the fence from Elkana southward, the U.S. will reduce U.S. loan guarantees to Israel by an amount equivalent to Israel's spending for the fence. Wolf made the announcement despite U.S. knowledge that Prime Minister Sharon had changed the route so that it would not include the city of Ariel. American sources confirmed that the U.S. opposes continued work on the fence and has many objections to its planned route. It appears that the Americans are willing to accept the fence only if it is built on the "green line." (Maariv-Hebrew) See also Sharon Delays Decision on Security Fence - Aluf Benn and Nathan Guttman The threatened reduction in guarantees is likely to come out of future installments, since the first installment, $1.6 billion, was used to back a bond issue Tuesday in New York. Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, a proponent of the fence encompassing the Ariel settlement bloc, agreed to a compromise, a three-kilometer "hole" that would be filled with troops to prevent terrorist infiltration while the fence continues to Jerusalem. Coalition whip Likud MK Gideon Sa'ar said Tuesday that if the fence goes up on the "green line" as the Americans insist, it would be "the biggest prize of all to Yasser Arafat." (Ha'aretz) Israeli officials dismissed PA proposals for a comprehensive cease-fire Thursday as just another attempt to win a temporary reprieve in order to regroup and reorganize. "What is needed is not a cease-fire, but real Palestinian reform and action against the terrorist infrastructure," a senior official in the Prime Minister's Office said Tuesday. Thursday's security cabinet resolution calling for the removal of Arafat also stated that the government "rejects any idea of a cease-fire as a way of dealing with terrorism; terrorism will stop only after the terrorist organizations have been dismantled and liquidated." (Jerusalem Post) Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis (Best of U.S., UK, and Israel):
No Palestinian prime minister has a chance to operate independently, especially on security matters, as long as Arafat is nearby. If there is any chance at all for this to happen, it will happen when Arafat is far away. In any case, there is a consensus among the security forces that removing or killing Arafat will broaden the bloody clashes, which could spread to Israeli Arabs. (Ha'aretz) It is easy to see the logic of expelling Yasser Arafat. In the year 2000, he had the opportunity to end Israeli occupation, and he said no. Instead of ending the conflict he allowed the intifada to erupt, destroying the peace camp in Israel and bringing extraordinary suffering to his own people. Not only is he unwilling to make peace, but he is determined to block any other Palestinian from doing so. Expulsion is not cost-free. It will probably produce the collapse of the Palestinian Authority and trigger violence and greater chaos for at least a period of time. The cost might be worth it over time if there was a pathway to work on reform on the inside and peace on the outside. Palestinians must see what can be gained. They must see what Arafat continues to cost them. If Israel is not ready to pay the price of expulsion in terms of credible new initiatives, then the message is clear: Don't do it. (Wall Street Journal-16Sep03) There can be absolutely no doubt of the legality of Israel's policy of targeting Hamas leaders. Hamas has declared war against Israel. All of its leaders are combatants, whether they wear military uniforms, suits, or religious garb. There is no realistic distinction between the political and military wings of Hamas, any more than there is a distinction between the political and military wings of al-Qaeda. The official policy of Hamas, like that of al-Qaeda, is the mass murder of civilians. The decision to employ that policy was made by its so-called "political" leaders. The U.S. properly targeted bin Laden and his associates, as well as Saddam Hussein and his sons. Under international law, combatants are appropriate military targets until they surrender. They may be killed in their sleep, while preparing military actions, or while participating in any other activity. They need not be arrested, or even given a chance to surrender. Only if they come out with their hands up, or waving a white flag, or affirmatively manifesting surrender by some other means, may they avoid the ultimate sanction of a war they started, namely death. Any democracy facing threats to its civilian population comparable to those faced by Israel would respond in much the same way Israel is now responding to the terrorism being conducted by Hamas and other terrorist groups. (Toronto Globe & Mail) None of us who at first supported the Oslo process imagined that it would end in the worst wave of terrorism in Israel's history. The more territory Israel ceded, the more terrorism it received in return. After three years of terrorist war, few Israelis believe anymore in the possibility of a comprehensive solution. At best, Israelis envision a series of interim solutions that will gradually ease the intensity of the conflict, rather than resolve it. The Israeli consensus is that this conflict isn't about Palestinian occupation but Israel's existence. However problematic, the West Bank settlements aren't the main problem. The reason there is no peace isn't because Jews live in Hebron but because they live in Tel Aviv. (Los Angeles Times) Observations:
The End of "Arafat" - Editorial (Wall Street Journal)
To subscribe to the Daily Alert, click here to send a blank email message. To unsubscribe, click here to send a blank email message. |