Prepared for the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in association with Access/Middle East by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
| |||||
To contact the Presidents Conference: [email protected]
In-Depth Issue:
Poll: Palestinians Support Armed Struggle Even After Statehood - Janine Zacharia (Jerusalem Post)
Iran Involved in Tannenbaum Kidnap - Ze'ev Schiff (Ha'aretz)
Hamas Holding Severed Leg of Israeli Soldier (AP/Ananova-UK)
U.S. Doctors Try to Restore Sight of Haifa Bombing Victim - Larry Brook
(Deep South Jewish Voice/JTA) |
News Resources - North America and Europe:
The Bush administration intends to press Iran to comply with an Oct. 31 deadline for opening the books on its past nuclear activities, senior officials said Wednesday, as U.S. skepticism grew toward this week's surprise agreement by Iran to stop enriching uranium. (Washington Post) See also Iran Nuclear Deal Risks Same Outcome as with North Korea - Gary Milhollin Under Tuesday's deal, Iran will shift into neutral, while keeping its nuclear potential intact. It won't - for the time being - operate its newly constructed centrifuges, which are needed to enrich uranium to weapon grade. But the deal won't stop Iran from building more centrifuges, thus adding to its future ability to enrich uranium. Nor does the agreement bar Iran from completing the factory that produces the uranium gas that goes into the centrifuges. Nor does it prevent the building of the heavy water reactor or, indeed, the resumption of enrichment in the future. Thus the agreement could insulate Iran from international censure without hampering its nuclear progress in any way. The only real solution is to convince Iran to dismantle all the plants that can make fuel for nuclear weapons. Otherwise, the current deal risks having the same outcome as the deal North Korea made in 1994 and later violated. (New York Times) The selection of long-time PLO advocate and Arafat ally Hanan Ashrawi for the Sydney Peace Prize makes a mockery of the award. Ashrawi doesn't meet the key criteria nominated by those behind the prize - a commitment to the principles and philosophy of non-violence. She doesn't fulfill the other major element either - having made no significant contributions to global peace. She supported the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990, has declared that Israeli civilians are legitimate targets for Palestinian terrorists, and doesn't think of Hamas as a terrorist group. (Sydney Daily Telegraph-Australia) See also Activist's Hardline Views Are Not Worthy of Peace Prize (Sydney Morning Herald); Lord Mayor Boycotts Awards (Sydney Morning Herald) A private memo written by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that discusses the war on terror was leaked to the press on Wednesday, revealing some of Rumsfeld's concerns about whether the Defense Department has the capacity or will to fight the war. (USA Today) News Resources - Israel, the Mideast, and Asia:
Two Palestinians were murdered Thursday in the West Bank city of Tulkarm after they admitted to cooperating with Israel, Army Radio reported. Masked militants shot the two in front of a crowd of people. (Ha'aretz) A car explosion in the Balata refugee camp near the West Bank city of Nablus killed three Palestinians including a Hamas activist Wednesday. Palestinian and Israeli officials said that the three were carrying explosives that detonated accidentally, in what is referred to as a "work accident." (Ha'aretz) Two Israelis were wounded in a terrorist shooting at the entrance to the Hebron community of Tel Rumeida on Wednesday. The terrorist opened fire from a house overlooking the road leading to Tel Rumeida, and then raced into the street where he continued shooting until he was killed by soldiers and members of the Jewish community's response team. (Jerusalem Post) Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis (Best of U.S., UK, and Israel):
There are Palestinians who are sincerely ready to reach a painful compromise with Israel. Others - and not only Hamas - don't want that. The question is whether those who want compromise, as drafted in the Geneva understandings, are capable of enforcing those commitments on the Palestinian organizations and gangs. Judging from the Oslo accords and subsequent agreements, there is a great doubt about the Palestinian ability to fulfill a security agreement. One of the lessons of Oslo is that, in any agreement with the Palestinians, Israel needs "security margins" broader than those it had since 1993. (Ha'aretz) In that pretentious document known as the "Geneva Understandings," "Article 6 - Jerusalem" includes inaccuracies and ignorance bordering on the ridiculous. Why does "withdrawal to June 4" grant the Palestinians Jaffa Gate, when it was in no-man's land until then? Were the residents of East Jerusalem asked if they favor being stripped of their Israeli residency and the accompanying rights? The opening of the document is a wonderful text encompassing all the ideals of Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation. But the initiator of the "understandings," Yossi Beilin, has been imprisoned for years in the concept of a "permanent agreement," insisting on proving that he has the power to draft a text that will formulate a model for an end to the conflict and deal with every aspect of the lethal confrontation. Therefore, he enlists the help of experts to provide him with "solutions." It's a pretension bordering on conceit. A permanent agreement and conciliation are ideals and the way to them is paved with a series of interim agreements, tested in the implementation, not in the brilliance of their language. (Ha'aretz) How come two years after Sept. 11 groups with terrorist ties are still able to insert their recruiters into America's military bases, prisons, and pretty much anywhere else they get a yen to go? It's not difficult to figure out: Wahhabism is the most militant form of Islam, the one followed by all 19 of the 9/11 terrorists and by Osama bin Laden. The Saudis - whose state religion is Wahhabism - fund the spread of their faith in lavishly endowed schools and mosques all over the world and, as a result, traditionally moderate Muslim populations from the Balkans to South Asia have been dramatically radicalized. Less Wahhabism is in America's interest. More Wahhabism is in the terrorists' interest. So why can't the U.S. introduce a policy whereby, for the duration of the war on terror, no organization directly funded by the Saudis will be eligible for any formal or informal role with any federal institution? That would also include the pro-Saudi Middle East Institute. (Chicago Sun-Times) Observations:
"Imagine an F-15 Flying 50 Meters Above Assad's Palace at 1 a.m." A senior military source told the Jerusalem Post Wednesday:
To subscribe to the Daily Alert, send a blank email message here. To unsubscribe, send a blank email message here. |