Prepared for the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
| ||||||
To contact the Presidents Conference: click here In-Depth Issues:
Two Katyusha Rockets Fired from Lebanon Hit Northern Israeli Town - Jack Khoury and Eli Ashkenazi (Ha'aretz)
Bush Trip Gave Irresistible Urge to Tweak Tail of Superpower - Richard Beeston (Times-UK)
UN Seeks to Halt Hizbullah Arms in Lebanon - Damien McElroy (Telegraph-UK)
Bedouin Attack Egyptian Guards Near Crossing with Israel (AP/International Herald Tribune)
Bush: Israel No Factor in Iraq War (JTA)
Search Key Links Media Contacts Back Issues Fair Use
|
News Resources - North America, Europe, and Asia:
The White House issued a stern warning to Tehran Monday after Iranian speedboats buzzed three U.S. navy ships passing through the strategic Strait of Hormuz and threatened to blow them up. A Pentagon official said that U.S. forces were "literally" on the verge of firing on the Iranian boats and had moved to man their guns when the Iranians turned and sped away. No shots were fired in the incident. "We urge the Iranians to refrain from such provocative actions that could lead to a dangerous incident in the future," said Gordon Johnson, spokesman for the White House's National Security Council. The incident occurred as a U.S. Navy cruiser, destroyer and frigate were crossing the strait when they were buzzed by the speedboats, which dropped boxes in the water in front of them. (Times-UK) See also U.S. Describes Confrontation with Iranian Boats - Thom Shanker and Brian Knowlton Defense Department officials said that as the Iranian boats neared the American vessels, a verbal warning broadcast over the internationally recognized bridge-to-bridge radio channel said, "I am coming at you, and you will explode in a few minutes." The five speedboats belonged to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. The Pentagon said last year that there were signs that Iran had turned command of its naval missions in the Persian Gulf over to the Revolutionary Guards maritime forces, stripping Iran's regular navy of that responsibility. (New York Times) Iran is developing nuclear missiles capable of reaching beyond its enemies in the Middle East to Europe. A senior Israeli cabinet minister has told the Sunday Telegraph that his government is convinced Iran is intent on becoming the first Muslim superpower, with weapons capable of striking not only at Israel but also Egypt, Libya, and Saudi Arabia as well as Greece and other parts of southeastern Europe. In an interview, Avi Dichter, the Israeli minister of public security, warned that Iran was developing missiles with a range of more than 1,250 miles. "Once you can reach double the distance between Iran and Israel with your missiles, it means there is some farther target. Is it Egypt? Libya? Saudi Arabia? A European country?" Dichter said there was almost no hope of an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord this year, and that a major operation against Hamas and other Islamist groups in Gaza would eventually be needed. He added that the Palestinian Authority's loss of Gaza to Hamas in June showed it was not ready to take full control of security in an eventual state, and that Gaza must be brought back under control before a Palestinian state is created. (Telegraph-UK) New Jersey on Friday became one of the few states to prohibit state pension money from being invested in companies that do business in Iran. Most American companies are already banned from doing business in the country, but Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed a measure restricting the state from buying stock in international companies that do business with Iran. Florida and California have similar laws. The New Jersey measure resembles a 2005 bill that prohibited investing state pension funds in companies doing business in Sudan. New Jersey recently divested $2.16 billion from 17 companies doing business in Sudan. (AP/New York Times) News Resources - Israel and the Mideast:
U.S. Secretary of State Rice told the Jerusalem Post on Monday that the U.S. does not consider it legitimate for Israel to build homes in some Jerusalem neighborhoods located beyond the "green line." Israel, which annexed eastern Jerusalem after the 1967 war, does not equate the capital's Jewish neighborhoods over the "green line" with settlements in the West Bank and does not believe that construction there is bound by its obligation under the road map peace plan. Rice said "the United States doesn't make a distinction" between settlement in eastern Jerusalem and the West Bank. "Har Homa is a settlement the United States has opposed from the very beginning," she said. Traditionally, the U.S. refrains from describing Jerusalem neighborhoods as "settlements." (Jerusalem Post) See also below Observations: Are Israeli Settlements Legal? (Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Prime Minister Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas are scheduled to meet in Jerusalem Tuesday to confirm an agreement to create negotiating committees and teams that will tackle the conflict's core issues. Olmert will also tell Abbas that Israel will not allow back into the country most of the Palestinian militants who took refuge in the Church of the Nativity in April 2002, since most of the militants are still involved in terrorism. (Ha'aretz) Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Monday that Hizbullah has acquired higher-quality rockets with longer ranges than those fired in the Second Lebanon War. He said there is currently free passage of arms between Syria and Lebanon. (Ynet News) Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis (Best of U.S., UK, and Israel):
Striving for exactitude, the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate unfortunately sacrificed lucidity. The key judgment of the NIE, that Tehran halted its nuclear weapon program in 2003, is plausible. Ever since assuming power in 1978, the rulers of the Islamic Republic of Iran have been ever willing to make the necessary tactical concession to walk around minefields. If the bomb-making part must be deferred to safeguard the more profound fissile material effort, so be it. Any threat comes from a combination of capabilities and intentions. The Islamic republic's intentions are breathtaking in their scope. Holocaust denial? This is just a frill. Wipe Israel off the map? A detail. The Iranians are committed to no less than a fundamental change in the existing world order. In his May 2006 letter to President Bush, Iranian President Ahmadinejad wrote: "Those with insight can already hear the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic system." This is not about Israel, or the Palestinians, or the Middle East. This is a declaration of war on everything that we in the West hold dear. (Washington Times) When George W. Bush arrives in Israel on Wednesday, the U.S. president will be greeted with adulation and gratitude. From the prime minister downwards, Israelis continue to hold Mr. Bush in high esteem, thanks to his unwavering support for the country in its struggle with Arab neighbors and militant Palestinian forces. Analysts say his popularity is founded on a common understanding of the broader conflict in the Middle East that defines the Arab-Israeli struggle as part of Mr. Bush's "war on terror." On the question of Israeli claims to land occupied after the 1967 war, Mr. Bush has been more supportive than any of his predecessors, arguing in a crucial letter three years ago that it was "unrealistic" to expect Israel to return fully to the pre-1967 border. (Financial Times-UK) See also Bush to Visit an Ambivalent Israel - Richard Boudreaux President Bush has accepted the permanence of the biggest Jewish settlement clusters in the West Bank and opposed a massive return of Palestinian refugees to Israel. He supports the Israeli army's vigorous pursuit of militants in the Palestinian territories and Israel's construction, now nearly complete, of a barrier between its territory and the West Bank. Israelis credit Bush's positions with helping protect them from Palestinian suicide bombers. But many fault him for pursuing sweeping regional goals that they fear have backfired. Though Israelis are grateful that Saddam Hussein is gone, they worry that the U.S. intervention in Iraq has benefited Israel's more dangerous enemy, Iran, better enabling Tehran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons. Israeli officials also view Bush's effort to promote Arab democracy as naive and counterproductive because it has empowered Islamists and Iranian clients in Iraq, Gaza, and Lebanon. (Los Angeles Times) Observations: Are Israeli Settlements Legal? (Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Unsubscribe from Daily Alert |