• Iran Backs Taliban with Cash and Arms - Margherita Stancati
  When Abdullah, a Taliban commander in central Afghanistan, needs more rifles and ammunition, he turns to the same people who pay his $580-a-month salary: his Iranian sponsors. "Iran supplies us with whatever we need," he said. Afghan and Western officials say Tehran has quietly increased its supply of weapons, ammunition and funding to the Taliban, and is now recruiting and training their fighters. (Wall Street Journal)
• To U.S. Allies, Al-Qaeda Affiliate in Syria Becomes the Lesser Evil - Yaroslav Trofimov
  The three main forces on the ground today in Syria are the Assad regime, Islamic State and an Islamist rebel alliance in which the Nusra Front - an al-Qaeda affiliate designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and UN - plays a major role. As the Assad regime wobbles and Islamic State gains ground in both Syria and Iraq, some of America's regional allies and even some Western officials argue that reaching out to the more pragmatic Nusra is the only rational choice left for the international community. In recent months, Saudi Arabia's new King Salman has moved to work much more closely with Turkey and Qatar in supporting the Islamist-dominated rebel alliance that includes Nusra.
      The dilemma facing policymakers is heightened by continued reports of atrocities committed by Nusra, including the killing on Wednesday of more than 20 Druse villagers by a local commander. (Wall Street Journal)
• Boycott Movement Grows, But Israel Fights Back - Oren Liebermann
  The BDS movement made front-page headlines after Stephane Richard, CEO of Orange, a French telecommunications company, said last week in Cairo that he would cut ties with the company's Israeli partner "tomorrow" if he could. After Prime Minister Netanyahu and other Israeli politicians blasted Richard's comments, Richard apologized for his remarks, said he was misunderstood, and is expected in Israel this week to clarify his comments.
      To counter the growing influence of the movement, Jewish-American mega-donors Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban bridged their political differences and pledged to start and fund an anti-boycott movement. "This isn't over. This is just the beginning," Saban told Channel 2 Israel about the Orange CEO and the boycott movement. "Any company that chooses to boycott business in Israel is going to look at this case, and once we're done, they're going to think twice whether they want to take on Israel or not. Trust me, this is just the beginning."  (CNN)

• IDF Probe Finds Deaths of Four Boys on Gaza Beach Was Accidental - Yonah Jeremy Bob
  One of the most famous incidents of the 2014 Gaza war with Hamas was the killing of four boys on a Gaza beach as they reportedly played soccer. No criminal charges will be filed against soldiers involved in the incident, the IDF Military Advocate General announced Thursday. (Jerusalem Post)
      See also Decisions of the IDF Military Advocate General Regarding Exceptional Incidents During the 2014 Gaza War
  The IDF Military Advocate General (MAG) has reached decisions concerning several exceptional incidents that occurred during Operation Protective Edge (7 July-26 August 2014).
      Allegations Concerning the Death of Four Children on the Gaza Strip Coast (16 July 2014): Four children were killed on a beach adjacent to Gaza port. The MAG ordered the opening of a criminal investigation into the incident. Video footage documenting the attack in real time was reviewed.
      The incident took place in an area that had long been known as a compound belonging to Hamas' Naval Police and Naval Force (commandos), and which was utilized exclusively by militants. The compound is closed off by a fence and clearly separated from the beach serving the civilian population. Affidavits provided by Palestinian witnesses stated that the compound was known to the local residents as a compound which was used exclusively by Hamas' Naval Police. The IDF carried out a number of attacks on the compound in the days prior to the incident. On the day prior to the incident, a container inside the compound used to store military supplies was attacked.
      The attack was aimed at figures who were understood to be militants from Hamas' Naval Forces, who had gathered in order to prepare military activities against the IDF. Under the circumstances in question, it would not have been possible to have identified these figures, via aerial surveillance, as children. It became clear after the fact that the identification of the figures as militants was in error. Nonetheless, the tragic outcome of the incident does not affect the legality of the attack.
      Allegations Concerning the Death of 15 Individuals During an Attack on the Al-Salam Building in Gaza City (21 July 2014): The IDF conducted an aerial attack on Sha'aban Dachdouch, a senior commander in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, who was present in an office in the Al-Salam building. The attack was carried out in the late evening in light of the assessment, premised upon timely intelligence, that there would not be civilians present at that time in the building, which was known to be an office building. The munition was selected to limit the damage to that part of the building where the target was located in order to minimize, to the extent feasible, the collateral damage. Regrettably, after the fact, there was an unforeseen collapse in the upper floors of the building approximately half an hour after the attack.
      Allegations Concerning the Death of 9 Individuals as the Result of an Attack on a Cafe on the Khan Yunis Coast (9 July 2014): The IDF investigation found the existence of grounds for a reasonable suspicion that the attack was not carried out in accordance with the rules and procedures applicable to IDF forces. As a result, the MAG has ordered the opening of a criminal investigation into the incident. (Israel Defense Forces Spokesperson)
• Hamas Begins Patrolling New Gaza Border Road - Elior Levy
  Armed Hamas jeep patrols have begun on a new border road in Gaza which runs parallel to IDF positions. (Ynet News)

The BDS Campaign


• BDS and the Politics of "Radical" Gestures - Todd Gitlin
  I was involved in the movement to make universities (and pension funds) divest from corporations involved in apartheid South Africa as a professor in the University of California Faculty for Full Divestment. No one in the American movement ever proposed to blacklist South African professors. The objective was not to drive the whites into the sea, or back to Holland or Great Britain.
      There are people of good will who support the BDS movement for boycotts and divestments against Israel, either because they think it can push Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians, or because they want to stamp their feet. Still, many supporters of BDS do not understand, or have not thought through, just what they are subscribing to. The 2005 BDS call, which can be read on the official BDS website, calls on Israel to end its "colonization of all Arab lands."
      According to Hamas, "Arab lands" include the entirety of Israel. The phrase is coded to imply that the very existence of the State of Israel is what constitutes "colonization." (If that were not so, it would suffice to say "end the occupation" that took place as a result of the 1967 war.) But one group's desire that another disappear deserves no respect.
      Unlike all proposals for just settlements of the murderous ethnic wars of our time - Rwanda, former Yugoslavia, Kashmir - BDS demands that one of those peoples give up the state in which they predominate. The writer is professor of journalism and sociology at Columbia University. (Tablet)
• We Must Fight BDS in the Name of Human Rights - Jonathan Sacks
  There is a growing and widespread concern among friends of Israel everywhere at the increasing threat posed by the BDS movement. Our fight against this movement will not be easy, but it is a fight we can and must win, not just for the survival of Israel or the safety of the Jewish people, but for the world. Universities in particular should be vigilant in ensuring freedom of speech, which means listening respectfully to views contrary to one's own.
      The BDS movement is the latest incarnation of the denial to Jews as a distinctive faith and people the right to be: the right to govern themselves in the land of their beginnings. During the Middle Ages, Jews were hated for their religion. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, they were hated for their race. Today they are hated for their nation state. Anti-Semitism is not simply about Jews. It is an offense against the fundamental dignity of difference.
      The rebirth, in this mutated form, of anti-Semitism within living memory of the Holocaust should be chilling for anyone with a genuine sense of humanity. An assault on Jews or the Jewish state is never an assault on them alone.
      Today, when Christians are being persecuted and Muslims murdered by the forces of radical political Islam, all who care for human rights, particularly European governments and their Jewish communities, must stand together with the Israeli government in their defense. Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks is the former chief rabbi of the UK and Commonwealth. (Jerusalem Post)
• Palestinian Human Rights Activist Opposes Boycott of Israel - Elior Levy
  Human rights activist Bassam Eid headed the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, which focused on human rights violations perpetrated by the PA in the West Bank and the Hamas regime in Gaza. Eid's organization received significant funding from European states until five years ago when funding from Europe came to an end. "I think it happened because European policy in recent years has been to come down hard on Israel and not the Palestinian Authority," Eid says.
      Eid has recently been trying to explain to the world that the activities of the BDS movement are only undermining the dream of a Palestinian state. "I'm opposed to the boycott because it only ends up harming the Palestinians themselves. Take, for example, the SodaStream plant in Mishor Adumim that is now moving some of its operations to Beersheba. I've met with Palestinians who worked at the factory....They told me they were earning an average of NIS 5,000 a month there, and that today they are being offered salaries of just NIS 1,400 in the PA....Do you think the boycott movement cares about them at all?"  (Ynet News)
• Anti-Israel Sentiment on College Campuses Is Swelling; It's Time to Go on the Attack - Liel Leibovitz
  Too often, we respond to hate the way a hapless nerd might respond to the bully about to stuff him into a locker, with some sad mixture of pride in our intellectual superiority and desperate attempt to be liked no matter what. But the only way to stop bullies is to fight them.
      This means, first, stop apologizing. Haters are going to hate. Do not try to debate them or appease them or engage them in any sort of feel-good exercise. Instead, drag their bigotry into the light and make them pay for it. Force those who fail to condemn the atrocities of Hamas, those who believe that the Jews are somehow to blame for the rage of the maniacs who repeatedly rise to murder them, and those who defile history and morality by comparing Israel to Apartheid-era South Africa or to Nazi Germany, to explain their hateful positions, and then explain why anyone so disdainful of reason and so devoid of empathy, decency, and common sense should have a place in any American institution of higher learning. (Tablet)
• The Evil of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel - Adrian Hilton
  To single out the democratic Jewish state for "special treatment" when so many other nations of the world are far worse is shameless anti-Semitism. The evil of the delegitimization of Israel is that it isolates the only democracy and persecutes the only free people in the Middle East. If the past century has taught us anything at all, it is that our failure to confront anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism has tragic consequences. (Archbishop Cranmer-UK)


Iran


• Israel's Role in the Struggle over the Iranian Nuclear Project - Yossi Kuperwasser
  The fact that Iran has not yet developed nuclear weapons, in spite of the 27 years in which it has been trying to do so, is due in no small part to Israel's efforts. Thus, the claims made that Iran's success in proceeding towards the attainment of nuclear weapons represent an Israeli failure are themselves worthy of ridicule. Without Israel's actions, Iran would have obtained nuclear weapons several years ago. Even a bad deal will postpone to some extent the decision to break out toward a bomb.
      As long as the negotiations continue, Israel should keep doing everything it can to prevent a bad deal with Iran. But if a bad deal is signed, then: Israel should multiply its intelligence attempts to know what is happening in Iran, so that it may sound the alarm; it should accelerate its efforts to develop the military capability to defend itself if necessary; and it should find ways to form a regional alliance determined to block Iranian attempts to translate its achievements in the nuclear realm into greater regional influence, even without developing a weapon.
      Under no circumstances should Israel accept understandings with the U.S. which limit its ability to decide by itself what kind of actions it may take to protect itself against the nuclear threats that may follow the deal. Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser was chief of the research division in IDF Military Intelligence and, until recently, director general of the Ministry of Strategic Affairs. (Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan University)
• How the Threat of a Military Option Against Iran Lost Its Coercive Power - Ray Takeyh and Roger Zakheim
  Speaking about Iran's nuclear program last month, President Obama said that "a military solution will not fix it, even if the United States participates." Such denigrations of the deterrent power of force have long been noticed in Iran. The U.S. administration is engaged in sensitive negotiations while systematically depriving itself of leverage.
      Military force may not be the ideal solution to the Iran nuclear issue, but it is an indispensable backdrop to viable diplomacy. In 2003, the Islamic Republic agreed to suspend all its nuclear activities. After the fear of being the target of American retribution dissipated in 2005, Iran resumed its nuclear activities. Had Iranians sensed that the U.S. was prepared to enforce its "red lines" with force, then they may have been less inclined to dismiss American mandates and the IAEA demands for access to atomic sites.
      Signaling that we have no intent to use force weakens our deterrence posture. Moreover, it has probably helped convince Iran that it can sign a deal and have a nuclear weapon, too. Ray Takeyh is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Roger Zakheim is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. (Wall Street Journal)


Saudi Arabia and Israel


• The Saudis Team Up with Israel - Michael J. Totten
  Saudi and Israeli diplomats jointly announced that they've held five meetings in secret since early last year. Retired Saudi general Anwar Majed Eshki and Israeli diplomat Dore Gold shook hands in front of the cameras during their announcement at the Council on Foreign Relations - a bigger deal than it seems. Not because it suddenly means that Israel and Saudi Arabia are best friends forever, but because shaking hands with or even saying hello to an Israeli is a crime in some Arab countries. But bigotries can fade in even the most reactionary countries over time and under the right circumstances, and it's actually happening in Saudi Arabia.
      Eshki says Saudi Arabia's number one priority is peace between Israelis and Arabs. Not between Israelis and Palestinians, but between Israel and the entire Arab world. It's true that the history between Muslims and Jews is long and unpleasant, but the history between Muslims and Christians is equally long and unpleasant, yet Saudi Arabia has normal relations with every Christian nation on earth. Officially, the Saudis don't recognize Israel's right to exist, but at least they acknowledge the reality of Israel's existence, and they're increasingly recognizing that the two nations have common interests and common real enemies. (World Affairs)
      See also Saudis and Israelis Meet in India - Shimon Shapira
  In May 2015, I visited the Indian city of Lucknow as part of an Israeli delegation from the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, headed by Dr. Dore Gold, where we met a Saudi delegation from the Middle East Center for Strategic and Legal Studies, located in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, chaired by Maj. Gen. (ret.) Dr. Anwar Majed Eshki.  Dr. Eshki visited Jerusalem this year and led Muslim prayers in the al-Aqsa Mosque. Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Dr. Shimon Shapira is a senior research associate at the Jerusalem Center. (Weekly Standard)


Other Issues


• The Case for Israel Is Rooted in More than Security - Jeff Jacoby
  Israel's new deputy foreign minister Tzipi Hotovely told the diplomatic corps: "We need to get back to the basic truth of our right to this land." The Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people, she declared, and their claim to it is as old as the Bible. "It's important to say this" when making Israel's case before the world, she said, and not to focus solely on Israel's security interests. Of course security is a profound concern, Hotovely observed, but arguments grounded in justice, morality, and deep historical rights are stronger.
      Jewish sovereignty wasn't regained by downplaying the historical and religious bonds linking the Jews to the land. Many world leaders and opinion-makers found those links intensely compelling. In 1891, alarmed by reports of Jews being massacred in Russia, hundreds of prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the speaker of the House of Representatives, and future President William McKinley, signed a petition urging the restoration of Palestine to Jewish rule. President Woodrow Wilson also endorsed the Zionist cause "to help restore the Holy Land to its people." The League of Nations in 1922 unanimously recognized "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine" and the justice of "reconstituting their national home in that country."  (Boston Globe)
• Surrounded by Hostile Neighbors, How Is Israel the 11th Happiest Nation in the World? - Aaron David Miller
  According to the latest World Happiness Report, published by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Israel now ranks 11th out of some 158 countries evaluated. The top 10 are affluent, secure, and some haven't been involved in a war in 70 years. They aren't living in the middle of ongoing, violent conflicts or are the objects of international campaigns to isolate or boycott them. None have groups on their borders with thousands of high trajectory weapons pointed at their civilian population centers.
      The Bloomberg Innovation Index ranked Israel as the fifth most innovative country in the world, ahead of both the U.S. and the UK. According to an OECD study, Israel is the fourth most educated nation. Above all, perhaps, in explaining the happiness stuff, is the very strong sense of identity that still seems to shape the way Israelis look at themselves and the rest of the world. Amidst all the fractiousness and divisiveness, there's still among Israelis a real sense of purpose, community, and pride of accomplishment. The writer is a vice president and distinguished scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. (Foreign Policy)

The Palestinians' Refusal Strategy - Yoni Ben-Menachem (Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs-Hebrew)

• The most talked-about issue in the territories last week was the Palestinian poll that found that half of Gaza residents want to emigrate. Palestinian experts explain the reason as the difficulties for the younger generation, for economic reasons, to marry, find a job and a place to live.
• The fact that the younger generation in the territories has begun to lose hope is due to the Palestinian refusal strategy which Mahmoud Abbas leads, and Hamas' plan to establish an Islamic state.
• Abbas has made a strategic decision not to return to negotiations with Israel without receiving international guarantees for an Israeli withdrawal to the '67 lines, a Palestinian state with its capital in east Jerusalem, and a solution to the refugee problem. Abbas has been encouraging boycott moves against Israel in recent days, to force Israel to accept Palestinian demands.
• Therefore, it is crucial for Israel to wage an intensive response to the international boycott campaign in order to show the world that this is damaging the chances for a political solution and strengthening the Palestinians' stance of refusal. The Palestinians are not interested in real negotiations but rather in an international decision that comes at the expense of Israel's security interests.
• But the Minister of History has other plans. The two major threats to the Middle East today are the spread of Iran and Islamic State, knocking aside the Palestinian problem. Within the Palestinian leadership are those who understand that Abbas' refusal strategy is mistaken and will only increase local distress because Israel is a strong state and in the end Abbas will not be able to force his will on Israel in the international political arena.
• These Palestinian officials believe that the major changes in the Middle East create new opportunities to restart negotiations with Israel. They say the Arab states today are more prepared than ever before to accept an agreement between Israel and the PA. These states, particularly the Gulf States, see Israel as an ally in the war against the spread of Iran and IS.
  
  The writer is former Director General and Chief Editor of the Israel Broadcasting Authority.