(New York Times) Daniel Mandel - In "A UN Plan for Israel" (New York Times, Dec. 14), Robert Wright says, "The United Nations created a Jewish state six decades ago, and it can create a Palestinian state now." But it cannot and would be well advised not to try. First, the UN didn't "create" Israel - sovereignty was asserted by its provisional government at the termination of British authority in the territory - nor was the 1947 General Assembly partition resolution even legally binding. It would have been, had both Jews and Arabs accepted it, but Arabs did not. Had Arab arms prevailed over the Jewish forces, there would have been no Israel, regardless of UN resolutions. Second, despite the importance of that resolution in changing the conditions surrounding Israel's emergence, the UN came onto a scene that Britain, the governing power, was vacating. In short, it filled a vacuum. There is no such vacuum today. Third, this idea suffers from the flawed tendency to believe that creating a Palestinian state will produce peace. Yet no perusal of Palestinian sermons, statements or publications suggests that Palestinians accept the idea of a peaceful state alongside Israel. If a Palestinian state won't bring peace, why create it? A U.S. policy that devises carrots and sticks to induce Palestinians to relinquish their war on Israel's continued existence provides the best basis for future, fruitful negotiations.
2010-12-23 10:33:14Full ArticleBACK Visit the Daily Alert Archive