Why Isn't Obama Pressuring the Palestinians?

(Foreign Policy) Steven J. Rosen - For the first time since the Oslo peace process started 18 years ago, Palestinian leaders are openly refusing to negotiate with the government of Israel. Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, explained the policy on Dec. 9: "We will not agree to negotiate as long as settlement building continues." But Abbas himself negotiated with seven previous Israeli prime ministers without such preconditions. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledges that the Palestinians are creating a new precondition for talks to begin. Settlements, she says, have "always been an issue within the negotiations.... There's never been a precondition." In refusing to meet with Israel, Abbas is violating one of the most important commitments his predecessor Yasir Arafat made at the start of the Oslo process, which included this pledge to then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on Sept. 9, 1993: "The PLO commits itself to the Middle East peace process, and to a peaceful resolution of the conflict between the two sides, and declares that all outstanding issues relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations." It is also a direct violation of the pledge that Abbas himself made barely three years ago at the Annapolis conference. But the Obama administration is raising no public objection to the Palestinians' stance. It has not expressed one word of criticism of Abbas, nor used anything resembling the pressure tactics Obama has so freely used against the Israeli side. In fact, Obama did quite the opposite on Oct. 7, when he issued a special waiver of Section 7040(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act to transfer additional funds directly to the Palestinian Authority, just as it was announcing its refusal to negotiate. The writer served for 23 years as foreign policy director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.


2011-01-05 09:24:45

Full Article

BACK

Visit the Daily Alert Archive