Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Washington Times] Uzi Rubin - Striving for exactitude, the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate unfortunately sacrificed lucidity. The key judgment of the NIE, that Tehran halted its nuclear weapon program in 2003, is plausible. Ever since assuming power in 1978, the rulers of the Islamic Republic of Iran have been ever willing to make the necessary tactical concession to walk around minefields. If the bomb-making part must be deferred to safeguard the more profound fissile material effort, so be it. Any threat comes from a combination of capabilities and intentions. The Islamic republic's intentions are breathtaking in their scope. Holocaust denial? This is just a frill. Wipe Israel off the map? A detail. The Iranians are committed to no less than a fundamental change in the existing world order. In his May 2006 letter to President Bush, Iranian President Ahmadinejad wrote: "Those with insight can already hear the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic system." This is not about Israel, or the Palestinians, or the Middle East. This is a declaration of war on everything that we in the West hold dear. 2008-01-08 01:00:00Full Article
Iran's Global Ambitions
[Washington Times] Uzi Rubin - Striving for exactitude, the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate unfortunately sacrificed lucidity. The key judgment of the NIE, that Tehran halted its nuclear weapon program in 2003, is plausible. Ever since assuming power in 1978, the rulers of the Islamic Republic of Iran have been ever willing to make the necessary tactical concession to walk around minefields. If the bomb-making part must be deferred to safeguard the more profound fissile material effort, so be it. Any threat comes from a combination of capabilities and intentions. The Islamic republic's intentions are breathtaking in their scope. Holocaust denial? This is just a frill. Wipe Israel off the map? A detail. The Iranians are committed to no less than a fundamental change in the existing world order. In his May 2006 letter to President Bush, Iranian President Ahmadinejad wrote: "Those with insight can already hear the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic system." This is not about Israel, or the Palestinians, or the Middle East. This is a declaration of war on everything that we in the West hold dear. 2008-01-08 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|