Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Washington Institute for Near East Policy] Jeffrey White - While Iran has been sending arms to Hizbullah through Syria for years, the interception on Nov. 3, 2009, by Israeli naval forces of a ship carrying 500 tons of weapons from Iran has important military and political implications. Iranian arms supplies underwrite Hizbullah's political position in Lebanon, increase the risk for a conflict with Israel, and ensure that any such conflict will be more intense and lengthier than if Hizbullah lacked such support. Both Iran and Syria seek to increase Hizbullah's capability to wage sustained warfare against Israel. The Hizbullah buildup puts pressure on the deterrence measures established by Israel in the north since the 2006 war. Greater military capabilities also strengthen Hizbullah's political position in Lebanon, where its substantial military might exceeds that of the Lebanese Army itself. Even if Israel can impede the maritime flow of arms, no effective way exists, short of war, to stop arms shipments to Hizbullah directly from Syrian arms depots or by air from Iran to Damascus and then into Lebanon. The writer is a defense fellow at The Washington Institute. 2009-11-13 06:00:00Full Article
Iran and Hizbullah: Significance of the Arms Ship Interception
[Washington Institute for Near East Policy] Jeffrey White - While Iran has been sending arms to Hizbullah through Syria for years, the interception on Nov. 3, 2009, by Israeli naval forces of a ship carrying 500 tons of weapons from Iran has important military and political implications. Iranian arms supplies underwrite Hizbullah's political position in Lebanon, increase the risk for a conflict with Israel, and ensure that any such conflict will be more intense and lengthier than if Hizbullah lacked such support. Both Iran and Syria seek to increase Hizbullah's capability to wage sustained warfare against Israel. The Hizbullah buildup puts pressure on the deterrence measures established by Israel in the north since the 2006 war. Greater military capabilities also strengthen Hizbullah's political position in Lebanon, where its substantial military might exceeds that of the Lebanese Army itself. Even if Israel can impede the maritime flow of arms, no effective way exists, short of war, to stop arms shipments to Hizbullah directly from Syrian arms depots or by air from Iran to Damascus and then into Lebanon. The writer is a defense fellow at The Washington Institute. 2009-11-13 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|