Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Slate] Lee Smith - An Iranian nuclear program would rearrange the region's political, economic, and cultural furniture. If Iran gets the bomb, other regional powers will pursue nuclear programs - if they are not already doing so. Inevitably in a region as volatile as this, there will be a few small-scale nuclear catastrophes, probably rulers targeting their own people. Saddam gassed the Kurds and slaughtered the Shiites, Hafez Assad massacred the Sunnis of Hama, and mass graves throughout the region testify to the willingness of Arab rulers to kill their own people - in their hands, a nuclear weapon is merely an upgrade in repressive technology. An Islamic bomb is concrete evidence that Iran's strategy of "resistance" to the West is a winning one. And this will change the region's political culture from radical to many times more radical. At best, this means that even U.S.-friendly regimes will have no choice but to raise the pitch of their anti-American rhetoric to stay in step with their rivals. Consequently, the basing rights that we have throughout the Gulf states are likely to be terminated. At worst, an Iranian bomb sends a message to the more ambitious actors in the region that they should feel free to make a run at the Americans. 2009-10-13 06:00:00Full Article
How Iranian Nukes Would Reshape the Middle East
[Slate] Lee Smith - An Iranian nuclear program would rearrange the region's political, economic, and cultural furniture. If Iran gets the bomb, other regional powers will pursue nuclear programs - if they are not already doing so. Inevitably in a region as volatile as this, there will be a few small-scale nuclear catastrophes, probably rulers targeting their own people. Saddam gassed the Kurds and slaughtered the Shiites, Hafez Assad massacred the Sunnis of Hama, and mass graves throughout the region testify to the willingness of Arab rulers to kill their own people - in their hands, a nuclear weapon is merely an upgrade in repressive technology. An Islamic bomb is concrete evidence that Iran's strategy of "resistance" to the West is a winning one. And this will change the region's political culture from radical to many times more radical. At best, this means that even U.S.-friendly regimes will have no choice but to raise the pitch of their anti-American rhetoric to stay in step with their rivals. Consequently, the basing rights that we have throughout the Gulf states are likely to be terminated. At worst, an Iranian bomb sends a message to the more ambitious actors in the region that they should feel free to make a run at the Americans. 2009-10-13 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|