Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[CAMERA] A study by CAMERA staff lists numerous examples of factual errors and double standards in the Goldstone report. Evidence damning Israel is normally deemed credible, whereas evidence exonerating Israel or damning Palestinians is dismissed. Information by NGOs is given weight when it suggests Israeli culpability, but is ignored or minimized when it suggests Palestinian guilt. The report concludes: "It is not reasonably possible to determine whether [Israeli] photographs show what is alleged." On the other hand, no doubt is cast on photographs provided by Palestinians. 2009-10-13 06:00:00Full Article
The Goldstone Report: A Study in Duplicity
[CAMERA] A study by CAMERA staff lists numerous examples of factual errors and double standards in the Goldstone report. Evidence damning Israel is normally deemed credible, whereas evidence exonerating Israel or damning Palestinians is dismissed. Information by NGOs is given weight when it suggests Israeli culpability, but is ignored or minimized when it suggests Palestinian guilt. The report concludes: "It is not reasonably possible to determine whether [Israeli] photographs show what is alleged." On the other hand, no doubt is cast on photographs provided by Palestinians. 2009-10-13 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|