Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Khaled Abu Toameh - The Palestinian Authority leadership's hysterical, hasty and clearly miscalculated response to Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech is likely to boomerang because it makes the Palestinians appear as "peace rejectionists." Even before he completed his speech, several PA officials and spokesmen used every available platform to declare their total rejection of Netanyahu's ideas. The harsh response of the PA is the direct result of high hopes that its leaders have pinned on the Obama administration. Reports about a looming crisis between the U.S. and Netanyahu, combined with Obama's conciliatory approach toward the Arab and Muslim worlds, had created the impression that the Israeli government had no choice but to accept all the Palestinian demands. The fact that Netanyahu is even prepared to talk about a Palestinian state is in itself a major achievement. So what if the future state of Palestine doesn't have an army and an air force? Why would Palestine need tanks and warplanes? Don't the Palestinians already have enough security forces and armed militias? Don't they already have enough ammunition and rockets? 2009-06-16 06:00:00Full Article
Behind the PA's Hysterical Reaction to Netanyahu's Speech
[Jerusalem Post] Khaled Abu Toameh - The Palestinian Authority leadership's hysterical, hasty and clearly miscalculated response to Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech is likely to boomerang because it makes the Palestinians appear as "peace rejectionists." Even before he completed his speech, several PA officials and spokesmen used every available platform to declare their total rejection of Netanyahu's ideas. The harsh response of the PA is the direct result of high hopes that its leaders have pinned on the Obama administration. Reports about a looming crisis between the U.S. and Netanyahu, combined with Obama's conciliatory approach toward the Arab and Muslim worlds, had created the impression that the Israeli government had no choice but to accept all the Palestinian demands. The fact that Netanyahu is even prepared to talk about a Palestinian state is in itself a major achievement. So what if the future state of Palestine doesn't have an army and an air force? Why would Palestine need tanks and warplanes? Don't the Palestinians already have enough security forces and armed militias? Don't they already have enough ammunition and rockets? 2009-06-16 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|