Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs] The report effectively ignores Israel's right of self-defense, makes unsubstantiated claims about its intent and challenges Israel's democratic values. At the same time the report all but ignores the deliberate strategy of Hamas of operating within and behind the civilian population. The report barely disguises its goal of instigating a political campaign against Israel. Despite the many widely reported instances of the abuse of civilian facilities by terrorist groups, and the statements of Hamas' own leaders praising women and children who acted as human shields, the report repeatedly stated that it could find no evidence of such activities. The report devotes considerable attention to "repression of dissent in Israel." It bases this assertion in large part on the widespread support for the military operation in the Israeli public. The notion that the majority of Israelis genuinely supported action to bring years of continuous rocket and missile attacks against Israeli civilians to an end does not appear to have occurred to the members of the UN mission. Regrettably, a one-sided report of this nature, claiming to represent international law, can only weaken the standing of law in future conflicts. At the same time, it will broadcast a deeply troubling message to terrorist groups wherever they are that the cynical tactics of seeking to exploit civilian suffering for political ends actually pays dividends. 2009-09-16 06:00:00Full Article
Israel Is Appalled and Disappointed by the Goldstone Report
[Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs] The report effectively ignores Israel's right of self-defense, makes unsubstantiated claims about its intent and challenges Israel's democratic values. At the same time the report all but ignores the deliberate strategy of Hamas of operating within and behind the civilian population. The report barely disguises its goal of instigating a political campaign against Israel. Despite the many widely reported instances of the abuse of civilian facilities by terrorist groups, and the statements of Hamas' own leaders praising women and children who acted as human shields, the report repeatedly stated that it could find no evidence of such activities. The report devotes considerable attention to "repression of dissent in Israel." It bases this assertion in large part on the widespread support for the military operation in the Israeli public. The notion that the majority of Israelis genuinely supported action to bring years of continuous rocket and missile attacks against Israeli civilians to an end does not appear to have occurred to the members of the UN mission. Regrettably, a one-sided report of this nature, claiming to represent international law, can only weaken the standing of law in future conflicts. At the same time, it will broadcast a deeply troubling message to terrorist groups wherever they are that the cynical tactics of seeking to exploit civilian suffering for political ends actually pays dividends. 2009-09-16 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|