Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[National Post-Canada] George Jonas - In a weekend conversation with Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, CNN program host Fareed Zakaria demonstrated the leading edge of current political thinking. He pressed Oren to admit that Israel is terribly upset about Iran developing nuclear technology. Having secured the ambassador's agreement that Israel wasn't ecstatic about it, Zakaria demanded to know why. The message Zakaria conveyed was: The problem isn't Iran developing nuclear technology; the problem is Israel being unable to tolerate it. If nuclear proliferation is too hard or ideologically uncomfortable to prevent, just say it's no problem. Equating the sensitivities of Israel, a country threatened with annihilation, with the sensitivities of the country that's doing the threatening is a new low in two-cent sophistry. It isn't Israel that's offended by Iran's very existence; it's the other way around. The Jewish state has no hostile designs on the Islamic Republic; it's the Islamic Republic that has hostile designs on the Jewish state. Israel's nuclear technology reduces the risk of war; Iran's nuclear technology increases it. The bomb in Israel's hand fosters peace in the region; the bomb in Iran's hand threatens war. 2009-08-19 06:00:00Full Article
Why Is Israel Concerned About Iran Nukes?
[National Post-Canada] George Jonas - In a weekend conversation with Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, CNN program host Fareed Zakaria demonstrated the leading edge of current political thinking. He pressed Oren to admit that Israel is terribly upset about Iran developing nuclear technology. Having secured the ambassador's agreement that Israel wasn't ecstatic about it, Zakaria demanded to know why. The message Zakaria conveyed was: The problem isn't Iran developing nuclear technology; the problem is Israel being unable to tolerate it. If nuclear proliferation is too hard or ideologically uncomfortable to prevent, just say it's no problem. Equating the sensitivities of Israel, a country threatened with annihilation, with the sensitivities of the country that's doing the threatening is a new low in two-cent sophistry. It isn't Israel that's offended by Iran's very existence; it's the other way around. The Jewish state has no hostile designs on the Islamic Republic; it's the Islamic Republic that has hostile designs on the Jewish state. Israel's nuclear technology reduces the risk of war; Iran's nuclear technology increases it. The bomb in Israel's hand fosters peace in the region; the bomb in Iran's hand threatens war. 2009-08-19 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|