Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Los Angeles Times] Selwyn Freeman - The Los Angeles Times' Feb. 14 editorial, "Israel's Identity Crisis," questioning Israel's ability "to be both a Jewish state and a democratic state," is patently absurd. The suggestion that these objectives are mutually exclusive has no basis in reality. Israel was established with the aim of extending civil rights to all of its people (not just Jews). For the most part, despite ongoing threats from neighboring Arab and Muslim states, Israel has successfully realized this ambition. As the Times correctly states, Israeli Arabs "vote in free elections, criticize the government and run for public office, privileges denied to many of their brethren elsewhere in the region." The suggestion that Israel's status as a democracy conflicts with the call by some politicians for loyalty oaths (which American schoolchildren recite every day) is ridiculous. The Hamas charter openly calls for Israel's destruction and allows for coexistence among people of different religions only under the rule of Islam, so Arab Israeli citizens who support Hamas are actually supporting religious intolerance and the destruction of their own state. Can one imagine the response by the U.S. if American Muslims were to begin waving al-Qaeda banners and openly advocating the destruction of the U.S. and the murder of non-Muslim Americans? Israel's forbearance in the face of similar provocation is quite amazing. Given the egregious human rights violations in Gaza and in much of the Arab and Muslim world, perhaps a better question for the Times would be if it's possible to be an Arab or Muslim state and a democracy. The writer is a barrister and solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria and the High Court of Australia. 2009-02-19 06:00:00Full Article
What Israeli Identity Crisis?
[Los Angeles Times] Selwyn Freeman - The Los Angeles Times' Feb. 14 editorial, "Israel's Identity Crisis," questioning Israel's ability "to be both a Jewish state and a democratic state," is patently absurd. The suggestion that these objectives are mutually exclusive has no basis in reality. Israel was established with the aim of extending civil rights to all of its people (not just Jews). For the most part, despite ongoing threats from neighboring Arab and Muslim states, Israel has successfully realized this ambition. As the Times correctly states, Israeli Arabs "vote in free elections, criticize the government and run for public office, privileges denied to many of their brethren elsewhere in the region." The suggestion that Israel's status as a democracy conflicts with the call by some politicians for loyalty oaths (which American schoolchildren recite every day) is ridiculous. The Hamas charter openly calls for Israel's destruction and allows for coexistence among people of different religions only under the rule of Islam, so Arab Israeli citizens who support Hamas are actually supporting religious intolerance and the destruction of their own state. Can one imagine the response by the U.S. if American Muslims were to begin waving al-Qaeda banners and openly advocating the destruction of the U.S. and the murder of non-Muslim Americans? Israel's forbearance in the face of similar provocation is quite amazing. Given the egregious human rights violations in Gaza and in much of the Arab and Muslim world, perhaps a better question for the Times would be if it's possible to be an Arab or Muslim state and a democracy. The writer is a barrister and solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria and the High Court of Australia. 2009-02-19 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|