Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[New York Times] Volker Perthes - American and Iranian leaders have signaled that they're prepared to talk. That's good. But getting results may prove to be more difficult than they imagine. The fact is that the first round is unlikely to be successful. The positions and expectations on both sides, and their notion of who should take the first step, are too far apart. Wasn't Washington's readiness to participate officially in the nuclear talks a tangible step, I asked a senior Iranian official of the reformist persuasion? "Not really," my interlocutor responded. "It is only the correction of a mistake. So the ball is now in the U.S. court." American officials will certainly see this differently. Up to now, Iran has said that it is prepared to negotiate, but not to give up enrichment or any other part of its nuclear program. The "5 plus 1" group (the U.S., Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany), however, sees Iranian enrichment as the core problem. The Security Council has passed five resolutions demanding that Iran suspend enrichment. The writer is director of SWP, the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 2009-05-22 06:00:00Full Article
The Difficulty of Talking to Iran
[New York Times] Volker Perthes - American and Iranian leaders have signaled that they're prepared to talk. That's good. But getting results may prove to be more difficult than they imagine. The fact is that the first round is unlikely to be successful. The positions and expectations on both sides, and their notion of who should take the first step, are too far apart. Wasn't Washington's readiness to participate officially in the nuclear talks a tangible step, I asked a senior Iranian official of the reformist persuasion? "Not really," my interlocutor responded. "It is only the correction of a mistake. So the ball is now in the U.S. court." American officials will certainly see this differently. Up to now, Iran has said that it is prepared to negotiate, but not to give up enrichment or any other part of its nuclear program. The "5 plus 1" group (the U.S., Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany), however, sees Iranian enrichment as the core problem. The Security Council has passed five resolutions demanding that Iran suspend enrichment. The writer is director of SWP, the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 2009-05-22 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|