Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Daniel Pipes - Does terrorism achieve its perpetrators' objectives? In his study, "Why Terrorism Does Not Work," Max Abrahms, a fellow at Stanford University, found that 28 terrorist groups (as designated by the State Department) with 42 different political goals had achieved only 3 of those goals, for a measly 7% success rate. The groups occasionally achieved limited success but mostly failed completely. Abrahms concludes that not only is terrorism "an ineffective instrument of coercion, but...its poor success rate is inherent to the tactic of terrorism itself." Frequent failure leads to demoralization, suggesting an eventual reduction of terrorism in favor of less violent tactics. 2009-04-24 06:00:00Full Article
The Limits of Terrorism
[Jerusalem Post] Daniel Pipes - Does terrorism achieve its perpetrators' objectives? In his study, "Why Terrorism Does Not Work," Max Abrahms, a fellow at Stanford University, found that 28 terrorist groups (as designated by the State Department) with 42 different political goals had achieved only 3 of those goals, for a measly 7% success rate. The groups occasionally achieved limited success but mostly failed completely. Abrahms concludes that not only is terrorism "an ineffective instrument of coercion, but...its poor success rate is inherent to the tactic of terrorism itself." Frequent failure leads to demoralization, suggesting an eventual reduction of terrorism in favor of less violent tactics. 2009-04-24 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|