Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Institute for National Security Affairs-Tel Aviv University] Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - The emerging nuclear fuel deal between the U.S., Russia, France, and Iran - whether it is actually implemented or not - is shaping up as another point Iran has scored to fend off international efforts that would cease its uranium enrichment activities. Iran has made it absolutely clear that it has no intention of giving up either its present capabilities or its nuclear activities in Natanz, Arak, and any other facility it may have in return for this deal. If Iran continues its uranium enrichment activities (as it avows it will), it would be able to replenish its low-enriched uranium stocks in less than a year. The deal was not conceived as part of a grand U.S. strategy for dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions, but was rather the outgrowth of the specific Iranian request to the IAEA for more fuel for its Tehran nuclear research reactor. Despite being under IAEA safeguards, this reactor has been used in the past for weapons-related research - the production of minute quantities of plutonium. 2009-10-26 06:00:00Full Article
The Nuclear Fuel Deal with Iran: Losing Sight of the Broader Picture?
[Institute for National Security Affairs-Tel Aviv University] Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - The emerging nuclear fuel deal between the U.S., Russia, France, and Iran - whether it is actually implemented or not - is shaping up as another point Iran has scored to fend off international efforts that would cease its uranium enrichment activities. Iran has made it absolutely clear that it has no intention of giving up either its present capabilities or its nuclear activities in Natanz, Arak, and any other facility it may have in return for this deal. If Iran continues its uranium enrichment activities (as it avows it will), it would be able to replenish its low-enriched uranium stocks in less than a year. The deal was not conceived as part of a grand U.S. strategy for dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions, but was rather the outgrowth of the specific Iranian request to the IAEA for more fuel for its Tehran nuclear research reactor. Despite being under IAEA safeguards, this reactor has been used in the past for weapons-related research - the production of minute quantities of plutonium. 2009-10-26 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|