Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Ha'aretz] Yehuda Ben Meir - The use of the terms "war crime" or "crime against humanity" in connection with Israel's act of self-defense against an armed terrorist organization acting from an area crowded with civilians is not only a distortion of the truth, it is also a moral perversion of the first order. People who say international law was violated during the Gaza operation are the ones using international law cynically for purposes that have nothing to do with concerns about the morality of warfare. The true moral question is who is the aggressor and who has implemented the right to self-defense. President Harry Truman ordered the dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan to spare the lives of American soldiers; the justification for this was anchored in the fact that Japan was responsible for the war. Of course it must be regretted that women and children were killed. But the responsibility for all the killing and suffering is solely that of the aggressor, Hamas. No civilian who was harmed is weighing on the Israeli conscience. This is the truth that lets us walk with our heads high. The writer is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies. 2009-02-04 06:00:00Full Article
The War Crimes Fiction
[Ha'aretz] Yehuda Ben Meir - The use of the terms "war crime" or "crime against humanity" in connection with Israel's act of self-defense against an armed terrorist organization acting from an area crowded with civilians is not only a distortion of the truth, it is also a moral perversion of the first order. People who say international law was violated during the Gaza operation are the ones using international law cynically for purposes that have nothing to do with concerns about the morality of warfare. The true moral question is who is the aggressor and who has implemented the right to self-defense. President Harry Truman ordered the dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan to spare the lives of American soldiers; the justification for this was anchored in the fact that Japan was responsible for the war. Of course it must be regretted that women and children were killed. But the responsibility for all the killing and suffering is solely that of the aggressor, Hamas. No civilian who was harmed is weighing on the Israeli conscience. This is the truth that lets us walk with our heads high. The writer is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies. 2009-02-04 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|