Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Jonathan Spyer - Seeking Iranian cooperation in dealing with the urgent situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan looks set to form a cornerstone in the U.S. policy of engagement with Tehran. Yet in the larger, strategic arena, Iran operates according to the dictum that America's difficulty is Iran's opportunity. Ample evidence points to Iranian covert assistance to the Afghan insurgents engaged in war against NATO forces in the country. So while the Iranians will be happy to talk if invited to, the talking will take place simultaneously with continued Iranian assistance to forces engaged in killing U.S. troops. The U.S. thinks that Tehran "should" support regional security and stability. The problem is that support for violence and insurgency brings with it myriad advantages to the Iranian regime. The Western powers, prevented from attaining their objectives, appear weak and helpless. The enemy, bogged down in conflicts elsewhere, has less time and capital to spend on containing Iranian ambitions. The writer is a senior researcher at the Global Research in International Affairs Center, IDC, Herzliya. 2009-05-05 06:00:00Full Article
Tehran's Stake in Regional Insecurity
[Jerusalem Post] Jonathan Spyer - Seeking Iranian cooperation in dealing with the urgent situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan looks set to form a cornerstone in the U.S. policy of engagement with Tehran. Yet in the larger, strategic arena, Iran operates according to the dictum that America's difficulty is Iran's opportunity. Ample evidence points to Iranian covert assistance to the Afghan insurgents engaged in war against NATO forces in the country. So while the Iranians will be happy to talk if invited to, the talking will take place simultaneously with continued Iranian assistance to forces engaged in killing U.S. troops. The U.S. thinks that Tehran "should" support regional security and stability. The problem is that support for violence and insurgency brings with it myriad advantages to the Iranian regime. The Western powers, prevented from attaining their objectives, appear weak and helpless. The enemy, bogged down in conflicts elsewhere, has less time and capital to spend on containing Iranian ambitions. The writer is a senior researcher at the Global Research in International Affairs Center, IDC, Herzliya. 2009-05-05 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|