Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Boston Globe] Jeff Jacoby - South African jurist Richard Goldstone and Dore Gold, Israel's former ambassador to the UN, were at Brandeis to discuss Goldstone's highly controversial UN report on Israel's Gaza operation last winter. Gold brought facts and figures, maps and photographs, and audio and video in English, Arabic, and Hebrew. The encounter marked the first time that Goldstone publicly debated the report's merits with a leading Israeli figure. It would not surprise me to learn that he is in no hurry for a second. Gold played video of Israelis under Hamas rocket attack, and noted that such attacks had increased 500 percent after Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. He displayed aerial photographs of Hamas military installations located amid schools and mosques. He described Israel's extraordinary efforts to avoid civilian casualties, and showed Palestinian TV broadcasts confirming those efforts. He presented images of weapons caches inside Palestinian mosques and homes. It was a powerful presentation - so powerful, in fact, that Goldstone regretted not having seen it earlier. "The sort of information shown to us by Ambassador Gold," he said, "should have been shown to us during the [UN] investigation." What was most striking of all was Goldstone's inability to give a clear answer to an essential question: What should a law-abiding country do to defend itself against relentless terrorist attacks? "What would you do if your population was facing repeated attacks for eight years?" asked Gold, after describing the thousands of rockets launched by Hamas at Israeli communities. The judge, astonishingly, had no answer. He responded that that was a decision for the Israelis to make. Where the UN is involved, the guilt of the Jewish state is always taken for granted. The Goldstone Commission was a sham, and its bottom line was foreordained. 2009-11-09 06:00:00Full Article
At Brandeis, Israel's Guilt and Innocence on Display
[Boston Globe] Jeff Jacoby - South African jurist Richard Goldstone and Dore Gold, Israel's former ambassador to the UN, were at Brandeis to discuss Goldstone's highly controversial UN report on Israel's Gaza operation last winter. Gold brought facts and figures, maps and photographs, and audio and video in English, Arabic, and Hebrew. The encounter marked the first time that Goldstone publicly debated the report's merits with a leading Israeli figure. It would not surprise me to learn that he is in no hurry for a second. Gold played video of Israelis under Hamas rocket attack, and noted that such attacks had increased 500 percent after Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. He displayed aerial photographs of Hamas military installations located amid schools and mosques. He described Israel's extraordinary efforts to avoid civilian casualties, and showed Palestinian TV broadcasts confirming those efforts. He presented images of weapons caches inside Palestinian mosques and homes. It was a powerful presentation - so powerful, in fact, that Goldstone regretted not having seen it earlier. "The sort of information shown to us by Ambassador Gold," he said, "should have been shown to us during the [UN] investigation." What was most striking of all was Goldstone's inability to give a clear answer to an essential question: What should a law-abiding country do to defend itself against relentless terrorist attacks? "What would you do if your population was facing repeated attacks for eight years?" asked Gold, after describing the thousands of rockets launched by Hamas at Israeli communities. The judge, astonishingly, had no answer. He responded that that was a decision for the Israelis to make. Where the UN is involved, the guilt of the Jewish state is always taken for granted. The Goldstone Commission was a sham, and its bottom line was foreordained. 2009-11-09 06:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|