Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Shimon Stein - The fundamental disagreements between Israel and the EU regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are linked to the lesson taken by European states from the profound trauma of World War II. The preference for multilateral frameworks, the adherence to the principles of international law, the rejection of the use of force to change political realities, the sanctification of human rights as an absolute value (that is sometimes applied in a manner that leaves a sense of double standards), and empathy toward those who are perceived as being weak - all these are part of the principles by which the EU states conduct themselves. The threat of terror, which has become an inseparable part of Israel's reality, and Israel's responses - which are covered obsessively - bumps up against a European reality that with a few exceptions has not experienced the horrors of terror. It follows from this that Israel's responses to terror, which result in unintended harm to civilians, are met by a lack of understanding. The writer is a former Israeli ambassador to Germany. 2010-01-06 07:47:12Full Article
Why Europe Remains Unwilling to Walk in Israel's Shoes
(Ha'aretz) Shimon Stein - The fundamental disagreements between Israel and the EU regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are linked to the lesson taken by European states from the profound trauma of World War II. The preference for multilateral frameworks, the adherence to the principles of international law, the rejection of the use of force to change political realities, the sanctification of human rights as an absolute value (that is sometimes applied in a manner that leaves a sense of double standards), and empathy toward those who are perceived as being weak - all these are part of the principles by which the EU states conduct themselves. The threat of terror, which has become an inseparable part of Israel's reality, and Israel's responses - which are covered obsessively - bumps up against a European reality that with a few exceptions has not experienced the horrors of terror. It follows from this that Israel's responses to terror, which result in unintended harm to civilians, are met by a lack of understanding. The writer is a former Israeli ambassador to Germany. 2010-01-06 07:47:12Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|