Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(PBS) Charlie Rose - In an interview on Jan. 6 prior to his return to the region, U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell said: "My hope [is] that we can make progress on three tracks....First, political negotiations, to get the parties into meaningful negotiations that will produce a peace agreement. Secondly, security, to make certain that any agreement ensures the security of the people of Israel and the Palestinian people and the surrounding states. And third, economic growth and what we call institutional efforts, to help the Palestinians improve their economy and...build from the ground up the institutions of governance." "Understand the different perspectives. Israel annexed Jerusalem in 1980....No other country, including the United States, recognizes that annexation. Neither do the Palestinians, nor the Arabs, of course. But for the Israelis, what they're building in is in part of Israel. Now, the others don't see it that way. So you have these widely divergent perspectives on the subject....The Israelis are not going to stop settlements in, or construction in East Jerusalem. They don't regard that as a settlement because they think it's part of Israel." Rose: "So you're going to let them go ahead even though no one recognizes the annexation?" Mitchell: "You say 'Let them go ahead.' It's what they regard as their country. They don't say they're letting us go ahead when we build in Manhattan." "The Israelis have a state, a very successful state. They want security, which they ought to have....The Palestinians don't have a state. They want one. And they ought to have one....The Palestinians are not going to get a state until the people of Israel have a reasonable sense of sustainable security. The Israelis, on the other hand, are not going to get that reasonable sense of sustainable security until there is a Palestinian state." Mitchell: "Both sides understand it's not going to be the '67 [lines]." Rose: "So settlements will have made a difference in terms of the way the final borders are determined." Mitchell: "Yes, they will. There is no doubt about that and I think that's a fairly universal understanding of that. That's just a reality that's going to have to be dealt with. You can ask wishfully that things might be as you would like them to be or you deal with them as they are, and I think we have to deal with them as they are." Rose: "When was the last time we used a stick?...You say to Israel, look, if you don't do this -" Mitchell: "Under American law, the United States can withhold support on loan guarantees to Israel. President George H.W. Bush did so on one occasion....That's one mechanism that's been publicly discussed. There are others, and you have to keep open whatever options. But our view is that we think the way to approach this is to try to persuade the parties what is in their self-interest." 2010-01-11 08:33:25Full Article
Mitchell: Settlements Will Help Determine Final Borders
(PBS) Charlie Rose - In an interview on Jan. 6 prior to his return to the region, U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell said: "My hope [is] that we can make progress on three tracks....First, political negotiations, to get the parties into meaningful negotiations that will produce a peace agreement. Secondly, security, to make certain that any agreement ensures the security of the people of Israel and the Palestinian people and the surrounding states. And third, economic growth and what we call institutional efforts, to help the Palestinians improve their economy and...build from the ground up the institutions of governance." "Understand the different perspectives. Israel annexed Jerusalem in 1980....No other country, including the United States, recognizes that annexation. Neither do the Palestinians, nor the Arabs, of course. But for the Israelis, what they're building in is in part of Israel. Now, the others don't see it that way. So you have these widely divergent perspectives on the subject....The Israelis are not going to stop settlements in, or construction in East Jerusalem. They don't regard that as a settlement because they think it's part of Israel." Rose: "So you're going to let them go ahead even though no one recognizes the annexation?" Mitchell: "You say 'Let them go ahead.' It's what they regard as their country. They don't say they're letting us go ahead when we build in Manhattan." "The Israelis have a state, a very successful state. They want security, which they ought to have....The Palestinians don't have a state. They want one. And they ought to have one....The Palestinians are not going to get a state until the people of Israel have a reasonable sense of sustainable security. The Israelis, on the other hand, are not going to get that reasonable sense of sustainable security until there is a Palestinian state." Mitchell: "Both sides understand it's not going to be the '67 [lines]." Rose: "So settlements will have made a difference in terms of the way the final borders are determined." Mitchell: "Yes, they will. There is no doubt about that and I think that's a fairly universal understanding of that. That's just a reality that's going to have to be dealt with. You can ask wishfully that things might be as you would like them to be or you deal with them as they are, and I think we have to deal with them as they are." Rose: "When was the last time we used a stick?...You say to Israel, look, if you don't do this -" Mitchell: "Under American law, the United States can withhold support on loan guarantees to Israel. President George H.W. Bush did so on one occasion....That's one mechanism that's been publicly discussed. There are others, and you have to keep open whatever options. But our view is that we think the way to approach this is to try to persuade the parties what is in their self-interest." 2010-01-11 08:33:25Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|