Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Financial Times-UK) Daniel Dombey, Najmeh Bozorgmehr, and James Blitz - Western diplomats believe that President Ahmadinejad's pledge to enrich uranium to 20% purity, closer to the level needed to build a nuclear weapon, has backfired and begun to change the mood in the Security Council. A senior U.S. official told the Financial Times that the decision was a "hollow" and "provocative" gesture that would make sanctions more likely. "I think there is sufficient support in the council for sanctions," said the official. "The Iranians see the Russians clearly moving towards joining us in a sanctions resolution." He said, "The Chinese will vote 'yes' or abstain, and I think they are likely to vote 'yes'." Turkey, Brazil and Nigeria have signaled their doubts. However, the U.S. and its allies hope that, at the very worst, some of the non-aligned members of the Security Council might simply abstain. "I think Iran all along intended to enrich to 20%," said Mark Fitzpatrick, proliferation expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, "ostensibly to supply the research reactor but also to gain experience enriching to higher levels that would prove useful for weapons production." 2010-02-10 10:41:01Full Article
Western Diplomats: Ahmadinejad's Move to Further Enrich Uranium Has Backfired
(Financial Times-UK) Daniel Dombey, Najmeh Bozorgmehr, and James Blitz - Western diplomats believe that President Ahmadinejad's pledge to enrich uranium to 20% purity, closer to the level needed to build a nuclear weapon, has backfired and begun to change the mood in the Security Council. A senior U.S. official told the Financial Times that the decision was a "hollow" and "provocative" gesture that would make sanctions more likely. "I think there is sufficient support in the council for sanctions," said the official. "The Iranians see the Russians clearly moving towards joining us in a sanctions resolution." He said, "The Chinese will vote 'yes' or abstain, and I think they are likely to vote 'yes'." Turkey, Brazil and Nigeria have signaled their doubts. However, the U.S. and its allies hope that, at the very worst, some of the non-aligned members of the Security Council might simply abstain. "I think Iran all along intended to enrich to 20%," said Mark Fitzpatrick, proliferation expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, "ostensibly to supply the research reactor but also to gain experience enriching to higher levels that would prove useful for weapons production." 2010-02-10 10:41:01Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|