Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(U.S. News) Mortimer B. Zuckerman - Who would have thought that a decision by a community planning board could ignite a firestorm between Israel and the U.S.? There is a serious problem in the harshness of the American response. How is Israel to interpret the fact that the U.S. spoke more harshly to a longtime ally than it did to the government of Iran when that oppressive regime reacted to a democratic uprising? Nor does it help that Israel was being held to account while the Palestinians escaped any rebuke for incitement to terrorism. Nothing positive comes out of public negotiations or public controversy. If issues are to be resolved, it will happen only through private channels and private dialogue. Above all, it is unwise to elevate Jerusalem as an issue because the question is so emotional for both parties. The status of Jerusalem should be raised only at the very end of a negotiation. 2010-03-23 08:10:49Full Article
In Middle East, Public Diplomacy Is the Wrong Approach
(U.S. News) Mortimer B. Zuckerman - Who would have thought that a decision by a community planning board could ignite a firestorm between Israel and the U.S.? There is a serious problem in the harshness of the American response. How is Israel to interpret the fact that the U.S. spoke more harshly to a longtime ally than it did to the government of Iran when that oppressive regime reacted to a democratic uprising? Nor does it help that Israel was being held to account while the Palestinians escaped any rebuke for incitement to terrorism. Nothing positive comes out of public negotiations or public controversy. If issues are to be resolved, it will happen only through private channels and private dialogue. Above all, it is unwise to elevate Jerusalem as an issue because the question is so emotional for both parties. The status of Jerusalem should be raised only at the very end of a negotiation. 2010-03-23 08:10:49Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|