Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Ray Takeyh - Although pressuring Israel on settlements may be a sensible means of gaining Arab participation in peace talks, it is unlikely to affect the region's passive approach to Iran. Indeed, should Tehran perceive fissures and divisions in the U.S.-Israeli alliance, it is likely to further harden its nuclear stance. The notion that the incumbent Arab regimes are reluctant to collaborate with the U.S. on Iran because of the prevailing impasse in the peace process is a misreading of regional realities. In private, as any visiting American dignitary can attest, the Arab states, particularly the Persian Gulf sheikdoms, decry Iran's ambitions, fear its accelerating nuclear program, and even hint at the advisability of using military force against its atomic installations. Yet they are loath to be part of an aggressive strategy which would unduly antagonize the Islamic Republic. Arab leaders would prefer that someone else take care of the Iran problem without their active complicity. Absent such a solution, they are likely to coexist with the Iranian bomb. No degree of peacemaking between Israelis and Palestinians is likely to alter that calculus. The writer is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 2010-04-12 09:34:45Full Article
A Link to Break: Iran and Mideast Peace Talks
(Washington Post) Ray Takeyh - Although pressuring Israel on settlements may be a sensible means of gaining Arab participation in peace talks, it is unlikely to affect the region's passive approach to Iran. Indeed, should Tehran perceive fissures and divisions in the U.S.-Israeli alliance, it is likely to further harden its nuclear stance. The notion that the incumbent Arab regimes are reluctant to collaborate with the U.S. on Iran because of the prevailing impasse in the peace process is a misreading of regional realities. In private, as any visiting American dignitary can attest, the Arab states, particularly the Persian Gulf sheikdoms, decry Iran's ambitions, fear its accelerating nuclear program, and even hint at the advisability of using military force against its atomic installations. Yet they are loath to be part of an aggressive strategy which would unduly antagonize the Islamic Republic. Arab leaders would prefer that someone else take care of the Iran problem without their active complicity. Absent such a solution, they are likely to coexist with the Iranian bomb. No degree of peacemaking between Israelis and Palestinians is likely to alter that calculus. The writer is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 2010-04-12 09:34:45Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|