Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Times-UK] Editorial - In Israel, polls suggest that 90 percent of the population believe that the response to Hizballah has been right and three-quarters of those surveyed think that the military campaign should be prosecuted more vigorously. The army is having no difficulty in mobilizing its reservists. Hizballah is perceived as representing a threat to the integral territory of Israel. There is, furthermore, a widely held fear that Hizballah will deploy whatever devices it could acquire against Israel and that it might not be long before Tel Aviv comes under fire. That prospect is deemed so dire that most Israelis would prefer to deal with Hizballah today, even at a sizeable cost to the country's image abroad as well as its young men in uniform, than rely on the UN. The Israeli public is pressing to see this mission through until the international community can provide a credible force for southern Lebanon that will actively deter Hizballah from launching missiles. Many outsiders seeing pictures of civilian casualties in Lebanon regard Israel as the aggressor. Israelis of all stripes have rarely felt more like victims. 2006-08-02 01:00:00Full Article
As Israel Sees It
[Times-UK] Editorial - In Israel, polls suggest that 90 percent of the population believe that the response to Hizballah has been right and three-quarters of those surveyed think that the military campaign should be prosecuted more vigorously. The army is having no difficulty in mobilizing its reservists. Hizballah is perceived as representing a threat to the integral territory of Israel. There is, furthermore, a widely held fear that Hizballah will deploy whatever devices it could acquire against Israel and that it might not be long before Tel Aviv comes under fire. That prospect is deemed so dire that most Israelis would prefer to deal with Hizballah today, even at a sizeable cost to the country's image abroad as well as its young men in uniform, than rely on the UN. The Israeli public is pressing to see this mission through until the international community can provide a credible force for southern Lebanon that will actively deter Hizballah from launching missiles. Many outsiders seeing pictures of civilian casualties in Lebanon regard Israel as the aggressor. Israelis of all stripes have rarely felt more like victims. 2006-08-02 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|