Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Ephraim Asculai - Two major events have shaken the non-proliferation regime since the previous Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty review conference in 2005: the confirmation of Iran's military nuclear ambitions and the destruction of Syria's reactor at Al-Kibar two years ago. Syria's refusal to allow the IAEA to inspect additional sites suspected of being connected to a nuclear project only aggravates the suspicions that Syria was developing nuclear weapons. Yet Iran and Syria will take their place at the NPT meeting as if nothing happened, considering themselves to be members of the NPT in good standing. Why should they be permitted to go on with the sham of proper NPT membership? Why should they not be relegated to a suspended, or at least observer, status at the review conference? The writer is a senior research associate at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies. 2010-05-03 07:58:02Full Article
Why Are Iran and Syria Still Members in Good Standing at the NPT Conference?
(Jerusalem Post) Ephraim Asculai - Two major events have shaken the non-proliferation regime since the previous Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty review conference in 2005: the confirmation of Iran's military nuclear ambitions and the destruction of Syria's reactor at Al-Kibar two years ago. Syria's refusal to allow the IAEA to inspect additional sites suspected of being connected to a nuclear project only aggravates the suspicions that Syria was developing nuclear weapons. Yet Iran and Syria will take their place at the NPT meeting as if nothing happened, considering themselves to be members of the NPT in good standing. Why should they be permitted to go on with the sham of proper NPT membership? Why should they not be relegated to a suspended, or at least observer, status at the review conference? The writer is a senior research associate at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies. 2010-05-03 07:58:02Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|