Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - Had President Obama not invited Prime Minister Netanyahu back to the White House for another meeting next Tuesday, then Netanyahu's upcoming visit to Canada - and the warm reception he is expected to receive from Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper - would have highlighted stark differences between the Canadian and U.S. administrations' public treatment of Israel. For the first visit to Canada by an Israeli prime minister in 16 years, there will be photographs and handshakes and press opportunities galore in Ottawa, a sharp contrast to the way Obama received Netanyahu in March: like an errant pupil brought into the principal's office for a scolding. It is obvious to all that Obama is now trying to correct the unfortunate impression left from that meeting. But while the tone will be much improved, the content will not have shifted all that much. When the Palestinians see Obama treat Netanyahu shabbily, they conclude that it is just a matter of time before Washington turns the screws another notch and "delivers" the Israeli government. But when they see Obama interacting warmly with Netanyahu, they will be less inclined to think that they don't have to do anything. Some say the Obama administration's sudden change of tone is insincere, a function of election politics in view of the midterm elections in November. But so what? The change is there, the reason is secondary. And this change demonstrates that regardless of who sits in the White House, there is only so far a president can go in trying to recalibrate the U.S.-Israeli relationship before certain checks come into play. For example, New York Sen. Charles Schumer is a very important American politician who could quite possibly be the next Senate majority leader. Schumer, who is Jewish and a close Obama ally, is also unabashedly pro-Israel. He will only let Obama go so far in his treatment of Israel before he pushes back, which he did last month.2010-05-28 10:17:59Full Article
Obama's Abrupt Change of Tone
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - Had President Obama not invited Prime Minister Netanyahu back to the White House for another meeting next Tuesday, then Netanyahu's upcoming visit to Canada - and the warm reception he is expected to receive from Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper - would have highlighted stark differences between the Canadian and U.S. administrations' public treatment of Israel. For the first visit to Canada by an Israeli prime minister in 16 years, there will be photographs and handshakes and press opportunities galore in Ottawa, a sharp contrast to the way Obama received Netanyahu in March: like an errant pupil brought into the principal's office for a scolding. It is obvious to all that Obama is now trying to correct the unfortunate impression left from that meeting. But while the tone will be much improved, the content will not have shifted all that much. When the Palestinians see Obama treat Netanyahu shabbily, they conclude that it is just a matter of time before Washington turns the screws another notch and "delivers" the Israeli government. But when they see Obama interacting warmly with Netanyahu, they will be less inclined to think that they don't have to do anything. Some say the Obama administration's sudden change of tone is insincere, a function of election politics in view of the midterm elections in November. But so what? The change is there, the reason is secondary. And this change demonstrates that regardless of who sits in the White House, there is only so far a president can go in trying to recalibrate the U.S.-Israeli relationship before certain checks come into play. For example, New York Sen. Charles Schumer is a very important American politician who could quite possibly be the next Senate majority leader. Schumer, who is Jewish and a close Obama ally, is also unabashedly pro-Israel. He will only let Obama go so far in his treatment of Israel before he pushes back, which he did last month.2010-05-28 10:17:59Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|