Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(AP) Lolita C. Baldor - The Obama administration's recent move to drop rhetorical references to Islamic radicalism is drawing fire in a new report by counter-terror experts at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The experts argue that the U.S. could clearly articulate the threat from radical Islamic extremists "without denigrating the Islamic religion in any way." The critics argue the need for an ideological counterattack, with policies and programs that empower moderate Islamic voices and contest extremist narratives. "There is an ideology that is driving al-Qaeda and its affiliates," said Matt Levitt, one of the authors of the study. 2010-07-13 10:29:15Full Article
U.S. Should Better Define Radical Islamist Threat
(AP) Lolita C. Baldor - The Obama administration's recent move to drop rhetorical references to Islamic radicalism is drawing fire in a new report by counter-terror experts at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. The experts argue that the U.S. could clearly articulate the threat from radical Islamic extremists "without denigrating the Islamic religion in any way." The critics argue the need for an ideological counterattack, with policies and programs that empower moderate Islamic voices and contest extremist narratives. "There is an ideology that is driving al-Qaeda and its affiliates," said Matt Levitt, one of the authors of the study. 2010-07-13 10:29:15Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|