Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies) Shlomo Brom - The August 3, 2010, exchange of fire between the Lebanese army and the IDF ostensibly demonstrates the fragility of the ceasefire on the Lebanon border, in effect since the end of the Second Lebanon War in August 2006. Examining the incident more carefully, however, confirms the stability of the ceasefire, based on mutual deterrence between Israel and Hizbullah. The most interesting reaction was that of Hizbullah, which did not take part in the incident. Apparently, Hizbullah has no interest in a confrontation, at least at this time. Hizbullah, which was accused of dragging Lebanon into a war in 2006 that caused the country extensive damage, in order to serve outside interests, is unwilling to pay the military or political price of a second round. Also important here is UNIFIL's role. If one of the two sides is interested in harming the other, it is not within UNIFIL's power to prevent it. 2010-08-10 08:01:04Full Article
The Exchange of Fire on Israel's Northern Border
(Institute for National Security Studies) Shlomo Brom - The August 3, 2010, exchange of fire between the Lebanese army and the IDF ostensibly demonstrates the fragility of the ceasefire on the Lebanon border, in effect since the end of the Second Lebanon War in August 2006. Examining the incident more carefully, however, confirms the stability of the ceasefire, based on mutual deterrence between Israel and Hizbullah. The most interesting reaction was that of Hizbullah, which did not take part in the incident. Apparently, Hizbullah has no interest in a confrontation, at least at this time. Hizbullah, which was accused of dragging Lebanon into a war in 2006 that caused the country extensive damage, in order to serve outside interests, is unwilling to pay the military or political price of a second round. Also important here is UNIFIL's role. If one of the two sides is interested in harming the other, it is not within UNIFIL's power to prevent it. 2010-08-10 08:01:04Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|