Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New Republic) Dore Gold - The argument that Israel is a colonialist entity is often marshaled to undermine the Jewish state's legitimacy. It claims that Israel was established as an outpost of another distant power imposing itself on the territory and its native inhabitants. But the fact is that Britain and the rest of the League of Nations considered Jewish rights in Palestine beyond their power to bestow because those rights were already there to be accepted. Thus the League of Nations gave recognition to "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine." In other words, it recognized a pre-existing right. It called for "reconstituting" the Jewish people's national home. The accusation that Israel has colonialist roots because of its connection to the British Mandate is ironic, since most of the Arab states owe their origins to the entry and domination of the European powers. Prior to World War I, the Arab states of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan did not exist. They became states as a result of European intervention, with the British putting the Hashemite family in power in two of these countries. Saudi Arabia and the smaller Gulf states emerged from treaties that their leaders signed with Britain. For many Palestinian spokesmen, it became important to deny the historical ties of the Jewish people to their land and to portray them as recent colonialist arrivals to the region - in contrast to the Palestinians, who were portrayed as the authentic native population. Arafat used to tell Western audiences that the Palestinians are descendents of the Jebusites, with ancient roots in the land. But in Palestinian society, one establishes one's status by claiming to be a relative latecomer, whose ancestors were from the Arabian families that accompanied the Second Caliph Umar bin al-Khattab when he conquered and colonized Byzantine Palestine in the seventh century. Even at that time, the Jews were still a plurality - and, perhaps along with the Samaritans, a majority - in the land, six hundred years after the Romans destroyed their ancient Temple and the Second Jewish Commonwealth. This emerges from Professor Moshe Gil's monumental 800-page A History of Palestine: 634-1099. 2010-08-18 09:10:05Full Article
Historical Fiction: Israel Is Not a Colonialist State
(New Republic) Dore Gold - The argument that Israel is a colonialist entity is often marshaled to undermine the Jewish state's legitimacy. It claims that Israel was established as an outpost of another distant power imposing itself on the territory and its native inhabitants. But the fact is that Britain and the rest of the League of Nations considered Jewish rights in Palestine beyond their power to bestow because those rights were already there to be accepted. Thus the League of Nations gave recognition to "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine." In other words, it recognized a pre-existing right. It called for "reconstituting" the Jewish people's national home. The accusation that Israel has colonialist roots because of its connection to the British Mandate is ironic, since most of the Arab states owe their origins to the entry and domination of the European powers. Prior to World War I, the Arab states of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan did not exist. They became states as a result of European intervention, with the British putting the Hashemite family in power in two of these countries. Saudi Arabia and the smaller Gulf states emerged from treaties that their leaders signed with Britain. For many Palestinian spokesmen, it became important to deny the historical ties of the Jewish people to their land and to portray them as recent colonialist arrivals to the region - in contrast to the Palestinians, who were portrayed as the authentic native population. Arafat used to tell Western audiences that the Palestinians are descendents of the Jebusites, with ancient roots in the land. But in Palestinian society, one establishes one's status by claiming to be a relative latecomer, whose ancestors were from the Arabian families that accompanied the Second Caliph Umar bin al-Khattab when he conquered and colonized Byzantine Palestine in the seventh century. Even at that time, the Jews were still a plurality - and, perhaps along with the Samaritans, a majority - in the land, six hundred years after the Romans destroyed their ancient Temple and the Second Jewish Commonwealth. This emerges from Professor Moshe Gil's monumental 800-page A History of Palestine: 634-1099. 2010-08-18 09:10:05Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|