Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Commentary) Evelyn Gordon - In exchange for a two-month extension of the freeze on settlement construction, Barack Obama has offered Israel various mouth-watering goodies. Yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leaning toward refusing. What gives? I suspect the real reason is too undiplomatic to state publicly: Obama, by his own actions, has shown he views presidential promises as made to be broken. Israel, after all, received its last presidential promise just six years ago, in exchange for leaving Gaza. In writing, George W. Bush said the Palestinian Authority must end incitement and terror, voiced support for Israel "as a Jewish state," vowed to "strengthen Israel's capability" to defend itself, and said any Israeli-Palestinian deal should leave Israel with the settlement blocs and "defensible borders." He also promised orally that Israel could continue building in the settlement blocs. But when Obama took office, he denied the oral pledge's very existence. And while Obama hasn't denied the written document's existence, he's nullified it de facto through his every word and action: he's never challenged PA incitement; he's advocated the indefensible pre-1967 borders, including in east Jerusalem (where he bullied Israel into halting construction even in huge Jewish neighborhoods that will clearly remain Israeli under any deal); and more. With enough domestic pressure, Obama would probably do everything in the latest offer anyway. But without it, Israelis fear he'll renege the moment he finds it convenient. 2010-10-01 09:29:01Full Article
Obama's Repudiation of Promises to Israel Comes Back to Haunt Him
(Commentary) Evelyn Gordon - In exchange for a two-month extension of the freeze on settlement construction, Barack Obama has offered Israel various mouth-watering goodies. Yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is leaning toward refusing. What gives? I suspect the real reason is too undiplomatic to state publicly: Obama, by his own actions, has shown he views presidential promises as made to be broken. Israel, after all, received its last presidential promise just six years ago, in exchange for leaving Gaza. In writing, George W. Bush said the Palestinian Authority must end incitement and terror, voiced support for Israel "as a Jewish state," vowed to "strengthen Israel's capability" to defend itself, and said any Israeli-Palestinian deal should leave Israel with the settlement blocs and "defensible borders." He also promised orally that Israel could continue building in the settlement blocs. But when Obama took office, he denied the oral pledge's very existence. And while Obama hasn't denied the written document's existence, he's nullified it de facto through his every word and action: he's never challenged PA incitement; he's advocated the indefensible pre-1967 borders, including in east Jerusalem (where he bullied Israel into halting construction even in huge Jewish neighborhoods that will clearly remain Israeli under any deal); and more. With enough domestic pressure, Obama would probably do everything in the latest offer anyway. But without it, Israelis fear he'll renege the moment he finds it convenient. 2010-10-01 09:29:01Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|