Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Post-Canada) Jonathan Kay - Last week at a conference dedicated to "Countering the Iranian threat," put on by the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the most interesting speaker was a gruff Israeli engineer named Uzi Rubin, the former head of Israel's Missile Defense Organization. Rubin spent much of his professional life carefully scrutinizing Iran's growing inventory of WMD-related technology. His research is guided by the simple question: What are these people building? Everyone already knows that Iran has the technology to enrich uranium, he explained. And once that technology is in place, it is pointless to debate whether it is designed for "civilian" or "military" purposes - it's just a question of the number of spin cycles. The other aspects of bomb construction are relatively minor. In the Manhattan Project, he noted, 90% of the effort went toward enriching the needed nuclear material. Once that was completed, it took only six months till a successful explosion was achieved. Iran has developed an indigenous missile-production infrastructure. The country now has the capability to design, construct and deploy multi-stage solid-fuel systems roughly similar to the U.S. Polaris A1 and Minuteman I. "Don't be fooled by those who say the Iranians are incapable of [advanced projects]," Rubin said. "I can see the confidence of their engineers. I've seen the technology. I can see the way they are solving problems faster and faster." Rubin concluded by ticking off the elements of Iran's advanced tech research: (1) nuclear enrichment, (2) solid-propellant ballistic missiles, (3) space-launch technology. Then he asked: "If a scientist from Mars would come down and say 'Hey, there's a country on earth that has these three programs - what does it want?' the answer is obvious: a nuclear ICBM." 2010-12-17 08:41:01Full Article
Imagining an Iranian ICBM
(National Post-Canada) Jonathan Kay - Last week at a conference dedicated to "Countering the Iranian threat," put on by the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the most interesting speaker was a gruff Israeli engineer named Uzi Rubin, the former head of Israel's Missile Defense Organization. Rubin spent much of his professional life carefully scrutinizing Iran's growing inventory of WMD-related technology. His research is guided by the simple question: What are these people building? Everyone already knows that Iran has the technology to enrich uranium, he explained. And once that technology is in place, it is pointless to debate whether it is designed for "civilian" or "military" purposes - it's just a question of the number of spin cycles. The other aspects of bomb construction are relatively minor. In the Manhattan Project, he noted, 90% of the effort went toward enriching the needed nuclear material. Once that was completed, it took only six months till a successful explosion was achieved. Iran has developed an indigenous missile-production infrastructure. The country now has the capability to design, construct and deploy multi-stage solid-fuel systems roughly similar to the U.S. Polaris A1 and Minuteman I. "Don't be fooled by those who say the Iranians are incapable of [advanced projects]," Rubin said. "I can see the confidence of their engineers. I've seen the technology. I can see the way they are solving problems faster and faster." Rubin concluded by ticking off the elements of Iran's advanced tech research: (1) nuclear enrichment, (2) solid-propellant ballistic missiles, (3) space-launch technology. Then he asked: "If a scientist from Mars would come down and say 'Hey, there's a country on earth that has these three programs - what does it want?' the answer is obvious: a nuclear ICBM." 2010-12-17 08:41:01Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|