Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Policy) Aaron David Miller - The arc of President Barack Obama's peace process efforts is leading inexorably to American "bridging" proposals - ideas on the core issues meant to literally bridge the gaps between Israeli and Palestinian positions - if not a U.S. plan to reach a framework accord on all the big issues. Obama will be told four things by those who are pushing him to be bold and decisive. First, the parties were "this close" to an accord at the last Camp David summit in 2000. Second, that a tremendous amount of work has been done in the past 10 years by Israelis and Palestinians on the core issues which have brought the parties closer than they've ever been. Third, that everyone knows the broad outlines of an agreement. And, fourth, that trying and failing is better than not having tried at all. Myth merges uneasily with fact here, and bad analysis and logical lapses seem to rule the day. First, on no issue were the two sides "this close" or even nearly so at Camp David in 2000. Second, a great deal of work has been done on the core issues - but by negotiators who risked very little because they were unempowered to negotiate. Third, the fact that we have a better idea of what a solution might be in no way makes it easier to get there. And, fourth, as for the old college try, failure costs, and sometimes it makes matters worse. The writer is a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. 2010-12-22 09:07:48Full Article
Wooing the Gods of the Peace Process
(Foreign Policy) Aaron David Miller - The arc of President Barack Obama's peace process efforts is leading inexorably to American "bridging" proposals - ideas on the core issues meant to literally bridge the gaps between Israeli and Palestinian positions - if not a U.S. plan to reach a framework accord on all the big issues. Obama will be told four things by those who are pushing him to be bold and decisive. First, the parties were "this close" to an accord at the last Camp David summit in 2000. Second, that a tremendous amount of work has been done in the past 10 years by Israelis and Palestinians on the core issues which have brought the parties closer than they've ever been. Third, that everyone knows the broad outlines of an agreement. And, fourth, that trying and failing is better than not having tried at all. Myth merges uneasily with fact here, and bad analysis and logical lapses seem to rule the day. First, on no issue were the two sides "this close" or even nearly so at Camp David in 2000. Second, a great deal of work has been done on the core issues - but by negotiators who risked very little because they were unempowered to negotiate. Third, the fact that we have a better idea of what a solution might be in no way makes it easier to get there. And, fourth, as for the old college try, failure costs, and sometimes it makes matters worse. The writer is a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. 2010-12-22 09:07:48Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|