Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Review) Jacob Mchangama - Pope Benedict XVI's call last week for increased protection of Christians targeted by sectarian violence in the Middle East was met with a furious response by the Egyptian government, which complained that the pope's comments constituted "unacceptable interference" in Egyptian affairs. Yet when in 2005 a Danish newspaper published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, the Egyptian government coordinated the campaign of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to pressure the Danish government into apologizing for the cartoons. The increasing extremist violence is the logical outcome of the institutionalization of a particular religious identity rather than pluralism, equal rights, and individual freedom as the basic framework of society. The efforts of OIC countries to promote Islamic values have legitimized and fanned the fundamentalism that now threatens to tear apart those societies. There is an urgent need to confront the OIC about its double standard. The plight of religious minorities and the denial of human rights in OIC countries must be put firmly on the agenda. The writer is director of legal affairs at the Danish think tank CEPOS. 2011-01-21 08:31:33Full Article
Double Standard at the Organization of the Islamic Conference
(National Review) Jacob Mchangama - Pope Benedict XVI's call last week for increased protection of Christians targeted by sectarian violence in the Middle East was met with a furious response by the Egyptian government, which complained that the pope's comments constituted "unacceptable interference" in Egyptian affairs. Yet when in 2005 a Danish newspaper published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, the Egyptian government coordinated the campaign of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to pressure the Danish government into apologizing for the cartoons. The increasing extremist violence is the logical outcome of the institutionalization of a particular religious identity rather than pluralism, equal rights, and individual freedom as the basic framework of society. The efforts of OIC countries to promote Islamic values have legitimized and fanned the fundamentalism that now threatens to tear apart those societies. There is an urgent need to confront the OIC about its double standard. The plight of religious minorities and the denial of human rights in OIC countries must be put firmly on the agenda. The writer is director of legal affairs at the Danish think tank CEPOS. 2011-01-21 08:31:33Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|