Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Wall Street Journal] Orde F. Kittrie - At Qana, Israeli aircraft fired toward a building to stop Hizballah from shooting rockets at its cities. The aircraft did not deliberately target civilians; but Hizballah rockets are targeted at civilians, a clear war crime. If Hizballah used Lebanese civilians in Qana as "human shields," then Hizballah, not Israel, is legally responsible for their deaths. Hizballah and Iran - which provides this terrorist group with arms, direction, and over $100 million a year - are in continual violation of international law. Their calls for Israel's destruction violate the international genocide treaty's prohibition of "direct and public incitement to commit genocide." Iran's effort to develop a nuclear arsenal that could obliterate Israel, or deter its responses to future Hizballah attacks, violates the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Iranian (and Syrian) support for Hizballah violates UN Security Council Resolution 1373, requiring states to "refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts." Hizballah began the armed conflict with rocket attacks on Israeli towns and the abduction of Israeli soldiers: unprovoked acts of war violating an internationally recognized border. China killed hundreds of peaceful Tiananmen Square protestors in 1989, and has for five decades occupied Tibet, slaughtering tens of thousands. As many as 200,000 have been killed as Russia has leveled the capital city of Grozny. All of the leading EU countries actively participated in NATO's 78-day bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999, killing hundreds of civilians, though Yugoslavia posed no threat to the existence of any of the EU countries that bombed it. Compared with how China, Russia, and the EU have dealt with non-existential threats, Israel's responses to the threats to its existence have been remarkably restrained rather than disproportionately violent. The writer, a professor of international law at Arizona State University, served in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. State Department from 1993 to 2003. 2006-08-08 01:00:00Full Article
Hizballah, Iran, and Syria - Not Israel - Are Flouting International Law
[Wall Street Journal] Orde F. Kittrie - At Qana, Israeli aircraft fired toward a building to stop Hizballah from shooting rockets at its cities. The aircraft did not deliberately target civilians; but Hizballah rockets are targeted at civilians, a clear war crime. If Hizballah used Lebanese civilians in Qana as "human shields," then Hizballah, not Israel, is legally responsible for their deaths. Hizballah and Iran - which provides this terrorist group with arms, direction, and over $100 million a year - are in continual violation of international law. Their calls for Israel's destruction violate the international genocide treaty's prohibition of "direct and public incitement to commit genocide." Iran's effort to develop a nuclear arsenal that could obliterate Israel, or deter its responses to future Hizballah attacks, violates the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Iranian (and Syrian) support for Hizballah violates UN Security Council Resolution 1373, requiring states to "refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts." Hizballah began the armed conflict with rocket attacks on Israeli towns and the abduction of Israeli soldiers: unprovoked acts of war violating an internationally recognized border. China killed hundreds of peaceful Tiananmen Square protestors in 1989, and has for five decades occupied Tibet, slaughtering tens of thousands. As many as 200,000 have been killed as Russia has leveled the capital city of Grozny. All of the leading EU countries actively participated in NATO's 78-day bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999, killing hundreds of civilians, though Yugoslavia posed no threat to the existence of any of the EU countries that bombed it. Compared with how China, Russia, and the EU have dealt with non-existential threats, Israel's responses to the threats to its existence have been remarkably restrained rather than disproportionately violent. The writer, a professor of international law at Arizona State University, served in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. State Department from 1993 to 2003. 2006-08-08 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|