Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Times-UK] Editorial - Over the past 48 hours the last vestiges of government control over the world's most impenetrable refuge of Islamist extremism have been quietly withdrawn. That refuge is Waziristan, the mountainous borderland between Peshawar and Afghanistan from which President Musharraf of Pakistan has pulled all his remaining troops after losing 700 of them in three years of inconclusive fighting. It leaves the Taliban and what remains of al-Qaeda's high command free to restock their arsenals and plan future operations unmolested by a national army. The case for invading Afghanistan and removing the Taliban after 9/11 was iron-clad. The moral case for maintaining the military presence necessary to rebuild the country remains as strong as ever, and the practical one for preventing the return of medievalism and state-sponsored terrorism is even stronger. NATO's current mission in Afghanistan is, in fact, a major counter-insurgency effort in which defeat is not an option, and those leading the campaign must be given the resources they need to prevail. 2006-09-08 01:00:00Full Article
Return of the Taliban
[Times-UK] Editorial - Over the past 48 hours the last vestiges of government control over the world's most impenetrable refuge of Islamist extremism have been quietly withdrawn. That refuge is Waziristan, the mountainous borderland between Peshawar and Afghanistan from which President Musharraf of Pakistan has pulled all his remaining troops after losing 700 of them in three years of inconclusive fighting. It leaves the Taliban and what remains of al-Qaeda's high command free to restock their arsenals and plan future operations unmolested by a national army. The case for invading Afghanistan and removing the Taliban after 9/11 was iron-clad. The moral case for maintaining the military presence necessary to rebuild the country remains as strong as ever, and the practical one for preventing the return of medievalism and state-sponsored terrorism is even stronger. NATO's current mission in Afghanistan is, in fact, a major counter-insurgency effort in which defeat is not an option, and those leading the campaign must be given the resources they need to prevail. 2006-09-08 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|