Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Newsweek) Michael Isikoff - The upcoming trial of two pro-Israel lobbyists accused of sharing classified U.S. government information with Israeli diplomats is causing anxiety within the State Department in the wake of a subpoena to David Satterfield, a top U.S. diplomat who now serves as Washington's deputy ambassador to Iraq. Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, both of whom worked for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), have pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring to communicate national defense information. The Justice Department is prosecuting the lobbyists under the World War I-era Espionage Act - a rarely used and vaguely-worded law that prohibits the dissemination of classified "national defense information." The case is unusual because the persons charged are not U.S. government officials but private lobbyists who could only have learned whatever classified information they had from others inside the government. Some legal commentators have cited the use of the law in these circumstances as unprecedented. Two legal sources close to the case confirmed that Satterfield is the anonymous official referred to in the indictment as "U.S. government official - 2" (USGO-2) who had two meetings with Rosen in early 2002 in which classified information allegedly was discussed. Abbe Lowell, the defense lawyer for Rosen, asks how can his client, a private citizen, be charged with disseminating classified information when the government official who allegedly gave it to him in the first place is not charged at all? Like many others - including lobbyists, journalists, and policy analysts - Rosen and Weissman had frequent conversations with U.S. government officials about national security issues that may have touched on classified matters. But the burden should be on the government officials to protect the information - not private citizens who receive it, the lawyers argue.2006-03-21 00:00:00Full Article
Lobbyists' Trial Could Embarrass Top U.S. Envoy
(Newsweek) Michael Isikoff - The upcoming trial of two pro-Israel lobbyists accused of sharing classified U.S. government information with Israeli diplomats is causing anxiety within the State Department in the wake of a subpoena to David Satterfield, a top U.S. diplomat who now serves as Washington's deputy ambassador to Iraq. Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, both of whom worked for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), have pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring to communicate national defense information. The Justice Department is prosecuting the lobbyists under the World War I-era Espionage Act - a rarely used and vaguely-worded law that prohibits the dissemination of classified "national defense information." The case is unusual because the persons charged are not U.S. government officials but private lobbyists who could only have learned whatever classified information they had from others inside the government. Some legal commentators have cited the use of the law in these circumstances as unprecedented. Two legal sources close to the case confirmed that Satterfield is the anonymous official referred to in the indictment as "U.S. government official - 2" (USGO-2) who had two meetings with Rosen in early 2002 in which classified information allegedly was discussed. Abbe Lowell, the defense lawyer for Rosen, asks how can his client, a private citizen, be charged with disseminating classified information when the government official who allegedly gave it to him in the first place is not charged at all? Like many others - including lobbyists, journalists, and policy analysts - Rosen and Weissman had frequent conversations with U.S. government officials about national security issues that may have touched on classified matters. But the burden should be on the government officials to protect the information - not private citizens who receive it, the lawyers argue.2006-03-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|