Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Yehezkel Dror - The weight of realpolitik interests in deciding on intervention in Libya will not escape the eyes of Arab-Islamic observers. Europe has self-serving interests to stabilize Libya, specifically to prevent undesired refugees from flooding their borders. Libya's vast oil reserves also play a role. The absence of Western action against rulers of other Arab countries who repress civic revolts, when the West is interested in them staying in power, will also be noticed by the Arab-Islamic world. Even graver is the expected lesson Arab rulers will take from the Libya episode, that they need weapons to deter Western action. Gaddafi surely regrets having abandoned his nuclear weapons program. If he had weapons of mass destruction, or at least the perception that he had them, the West would have backed off. The action against Gaddafi will harden the will of Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, the transformation of Libya into a tranquil democratic state is far from assured. Surely there is no room for sympathy for Gaddafi, but it is far from clear that those taking his place will be less hostile. 2011-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Realpolitik in Libya
(Ha'aretz) Yehezkel Dror - The weight of realpolitik interests in deciding on intervention in Libya will not escape the eyes of Arab-Islamic observers. Europe has self-serving interests to stabilize Libya, specifically to prevent undesired refugees from flooding their borders. Libya's vast oil reserves also play a role. The absence of Western action against rulers of other Arab countries who repress civic revolts, when the West is interested in them staying in power, will also be noticed by the Arab-Islamic world. Even graver is the expected lesson Arab rulers will take from the Libya episode, that they need weapons to deter Western action. Gaddafi surely regrets having abandoned his nuclear weapons program. If he had weapons of mass destruction, or at least the perception that he had them, the West would have backed off. The action against Gaddafi will harden the will of Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, the transformation of Libya into a tranquil democratic state is far from assured. Surely there is no room for sympathy for Gaddafi, but it is far from clear that those taking his place will be less hostile. 2011-03-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|