Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - * When the British government condemned an Israeli missile attack on March 6 that killed a senior Islamic Jihad commander, another terrorist, and two bystanders in Gaza City, its official statement included the phrase: "Israel has the right to defend itself." * Tal Becker, the acting director of the Foreign Ministry's international law department, sees the inclusion of that phrase as indicating a significant change in the world's attitude toward how it feels Israel, and indeed other countries, can fight terrorism. * "One of the things that has happened because of the enormity of the 9/11 attack and the risk of catastrophic terror worldwide is the realization that sometimes you have to fight terrorism not through a law enforcement, criminal model, but rather through a war model," said Becker, author of a recently released book, Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility. * Slowly, Becker said, people have come to realize that "it is hard to talk about a solely criminal model when the actor is engaged not for a private agenda, but for a public ideological agenda, and when he has the capacity to wreak the kind of devastation we used to think that only states with armies were capable of inflicting." * "In the specific context of Israel, time and time again European leaders, and not just European leaders, now say that they recognize Israel's right of self-defense against terror. With that statement they are saying that sometimes an armed-conflict model regulates dealing with terrorism, and that is a dramatic shift." 2006-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
Israel Has the Right to Defend Itself
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - * When the British government condemned an Israeli missile attack on March 6 that killed a senior Islamic Jihad commander, another terrorist, and two bystanders in Gaza City, its official statement included the phrase: "Israel has the right to defend itself." * Tal Becker, the acting director of the Foreign Ministry's international law department, sees the inclusion of that phrase as indicating a significant change in the world's attitude toward how it feels Israel, and indeed other countries, can fight terrorism. * "One of the things that has happened because of the enormity of the 9/11 attack and the risk of catastrophic terror worldwide is the realization that sometimes you have to fight terrorism not through a law enforcement, criminal model, but rather through a war model," said Becker, author of a recently released book, Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility. * Slowly, Becker said, people have come to realize that "it is hard to talk about a solely criminal model when the actor is engaged not for a private agenda, but for a public ideological agenda, and when he has the capacity to wreak the kind of devastation we used to think that only states with armies were capable of inflicting." * "In the specific context of Israel, time and time again European leaders, and not just European leaders, now say that they recognize Israel's right of self-defense against terror. With that statement they are saying that sometimes an armed-conflict model regulates dealing with terrorism, and that is a dramatic shift." 2006-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|