Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Alan Baker - Is it possible to have the Goldstone Report revoked, and thereby place the genie back in the bottle? While the infamous "Zionism=racism" resolution adopted by the General Assembly in November 1975 was, in fact, never revoked, because there is no mechanism for revoking UN resolutions, its content was emptied of all substance by a further resolution in 1991. This should be the way to proceed to revoke the dangerous content of the Goldstone Report. If Goldstone sincerely regrets his report and the damage it has caused, the only way to minimize such damage would be to formally address his message to the secretary-general and to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. This would involve an appearance before the Human Rights Council which commissioned and mandated his report, and before the General Assembly, which endorsed it. Both bodies would then have to adopt resolutions revoking the content of their earlier resolutions, made on the strength of Goldstone's conclusions. The writer, a former legal adviser to the Israel Foreign Ministry and Israeli ambassador to Canada, is director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. 2011-04-07 00:00:00Full Article
Judge Goldstone's Turnabout - What Next?
(Jerusalem Post) Alan Baker - Is it possible to have the Goldstone Report revoked, and thereby place the genie back in the bottle? While the infamous "Zionism=racism" resolution adopted by the General Assembly in November 1975 was, in fact, never revoked, because there is no mechanism for revoking UN resolutions, its content was emptied of all substance by a further resolution in 1991. This should be the way to proceed to revoke the dangerous content of the Goldstone Report. If Goldstone sincerely regrets his report and the damage it has caused, the only way to minimize such damage would be to formally address his message to the secretary-general and to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. This would involve an appearance before the Human Rights Council which commissioned and mandated his report, and before the General Assembly, which endorsed it. Both bodies would then have to adopt resolutions revoking the content of their earlier resolutions, made on the strength of Goldstone's conclusions. The writer, a former legal adviser to the Israel Foreign Ministry and Israeli ambassador to Canada, is director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. 2011-04-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|