Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Gerald M. Steinberg - During the Oslo era, each stage of negotiations was accompanied by an amnesty for terrorists, who even signed statements forswearing terrorism. And each time, the cease-fire declarations proved to be merely facades for rearming terrorist groups, allowing them to prepare for the next (more deadly) wave of attacks. The Palestinians claim that the general practice of peace negotiations after bitter wars includes the mutual exchange of prisoners. But, as Israel points out, these terrorists were not part of a defeated army that fought according to the rules of the Geneva Conventions. Instead, they violated all rules of civilized behavior. And each time the war against Israel kept going, with the participation of the newly released prisoners. Rather than a mass release of these terrorists, after more than 1,000 murders by suicide bombers and other attackers, Israelis argue that they should be tried for crimes against humanity. 2005-02-07 00:00:00Full Article
Prisoner Release Demands: We've Seen This Movie Before
(Jerusalem Post) Gerald M. Steinberg - During the Oslo era, each stage of negotiations was accompanied by an amnesty for terrorists, who even signed statements forswearing terrorism. And each time, the cease-fire declarations proved to be merely facades for rearming terrorist groups, allowing them to prepare for the next (more deadly) wave of attacks. The Palestinians claim that the general practice of peace negotiations after bitter wars includes the mutual exchange of prisoners. But, as Israel points out, these terrorists were not part of a defeated army that fought according to the rules of the Geneva Conventions. Instead, they violated all rules of civilized behavior. And each time the war against Israel kept going, with the participation of the newly released prisoners. Rather than a mass release of these terrorists, after more than 1,000 murders by suicide bombers and other attackers, Israelis argue that they should be tried for crimes against humanity. 2005-02-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|