Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - * How is this summit different from previous summits? Two reasons: the death of Arafat and general Palestinian exhaustion. Yet there are some lessons from past hopeful moments that should be learned to help ensure that this one is not squandered. * The first is that it is not enough to let the terrorists take a break, while leaving intact the moral and physical infrastructure that supports them. We cannot expect any cease-fire to hold if thousands of terrorists retain their weapons and are free to decide at any moment that it is time to renew attacks against Israel. These terrorists will not be stopped by throwing money at the Palestinian Authority, or by "helping Abu Mazen" by releasing prisoners. * It is difficult to see how the release of killers captured by Israel would advance the process. The issue is not so much one of which have "blood on their hands" and which do not (presumably not for lack of trying). More fundamentally, it is a question of whether Israel should be releasing prisoners when no action has yet been taken to ensure that terror will not resume. * The Palestinians claim it is Israel that must gain their trust by such prisoner releases. But time after time, Israel has trusted the Palestinians and taken risks, only to have those gestures thrown back in our faces with another round of terror. * Based on experience, yet contrary to the international conventional wisdom, premature Israeli concessions lead not to the beginning of a peace process but to the end of Palestinian compliance with their commitments. 2005-02-08 00:00:00Full Article
How This Summit Could be Different
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - * How is this summit different from previous summits? Two reasons: the death of Arafat and general Palestinian exhaustion. Yet there are some lessons from past hopeful moments that should be learned to help ensure that this one is not squandered. * The first is that it is not enough to let the terrorists take a break, while leaving intact the moral and physical infrastructure that supports them. We cannot expect any cease-fire to hold if thousands of terrorists retain their weapons and are free to decide at any moment that it is time to renew attacks against Israel. These terrorists will not be stopped by throwing money at the Palestinian Authority, or by "helping Abu Mazen" by releasing prisoners. * It is difficult to see how the release of killers captured by Israel would advance the process. The issue is not so much one of which have "blood on their hands" and which do not (presumably not for lack of trying). More fundamentally, it is a question of whether Israel should be releasing prisoners when no action has yet been taken to ensure that terror will not resume. * The Palestinians claim it is Israel that must gain their trust by such prisoner releases. But time after time, Israel has trusted the Palestinians and taken risks, only to have those gestures thrown back in our faces with another round of terror. * Based on experience, yet contrary to the international conventional wisdom, premature Israeli concessions lead not to the beginning of a peace process but to the end of Palestinian compliance with their commitments. 2005-02-08 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|