Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Matthew Levitt - The cease-fire announced on Feb. 8 created a window of opportunity that will slam shut quickly if terrorists resume attacks against Israel. After four-and-a-half years of incessant terrorist activity, Israeli tolerance for negotiating peace in the face of ongoing attacks is nil. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad have so far dismissed the cease-fire, and previously negotiated ones have all failed. Moreover, Iran and Hizballah are more proactively involved in recruiting, training, and financing Palestinian suicide bombers than ever before. Hamas has agreed to more than ten cease-fires since 1993, but not a single one has held. The willingness of Hamas to agree to cease-fires at certain times is understandable - all past truces were brokered during periods when the group needed a respite to regroup after Israel and/or PA crackdowns. During each of these cease-fire periods, Hamas leaders continued to support the main goal of the original Hamas charter (the creation through sanctioned violence of an Islamic state in all of "Palestine"). Cease-fires have traditionally served as breathers, allowing groups to rearm, replenish funds, and consolidate cells before undertaking further attacks. Taking action against these groups and preparing Palestinian security forces to contend with their continued attacks will be crucial to keeping this window of opportunity open. The writer is a senior fellow and director of the Terrorism Studies Program at the Washington Institute. 2005-02-11 00:00:00Full Article
Sustaining an Israeli-Palestinian Cease-Fire
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Matthew Levitt - The cease-fire announced on Feb. 8 created a window of opportunity that will slam shut quickly if terrorists resume attacks against Israel. After four-and-a-half years of incessant terrorist activity, Israeli tolerance for negotiating peace in the face of ongoing attacks is nil. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad have so far dismissed the cease-fire, and previously negotiated ones have all failed. Moreover, Iran and Hizballah are more proactively involved in recruiting, training, and financing Palestinian suicide bombers than ever before. Hamas has agreed to more than ten cease-fires since 1993, but not a single one has held. The willingness of Hamas to agree to cease-fires at certain times is understandable - all past truces were brokered during periods when the group needed a respite to regroup after Israel and/or PA crackdowns. During each of these cease-fire periods, Hamas leaders continued to support the main goal of the original Hamas charter (the creation through sanctioned violence of an Islamic state in all of "Palestine"). Cease-fires have traditionally served as breathers, allowing groups to rearm, replenish funds, and consolidate cells before undertaking further attacks. Taking action against these groups and preparing Palestinian security forces to contend with their continued attacks will be crucial to keeping this window of opportunity open. The writer is a senior fellow and director of the Terrorism Studies Program at the Washington Institute. 2005-02-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|