Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Chicago Tribune) Editorial - There was the illusion of a democratic election in Saudi Arabia last week. It had all the trappings, including a city plastered with campaign billboards. But what happened in the Islamic kingdom should in no way be confused with a real election. Women were barred from running or voting. Half the seats were to be appointed by the royal family. Perhaps there was a time when even such a sham election would be hailed in the Middle East. But now that genuine elections have inspired millions of voters to choose their leaders in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Palestinian territories, the Saudi vote looks like little more than a whisper of progress. The hunger for real elections - and real elected leaders - is out there and growing, even in countries like Saudi Arabia, where political gatherings are generally illegal and outright criticism of the royal family can bring a prison sentence. As tyrants across the world have learned, once the power of democracy is unleashed, it cannot be easily stifled. Saudi citizens, tossed a tiny scrap from the banquet of democracy, will crave more.2005-02-15 00:00:00Full Article
The Saudi Illusion of Democracy
(Chicago Tribune) Editorial - There was the illusion of a democratic election in Saudi Arabia last week. It had all the trappings, including a city plastered with campaign billboards. But what happened in the Islamic kingdom should in no way be confused with a real election. Women were barred from running or voting. Half the seats were to be appointed by the royal family. Perhaps there was a time when even such a sham election would be hailed in the Middle East. But now that genuine elections have inspired millions of voters to choose their leaders in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Palestinian territories, the Saudi vote looks like little more than a whisper of progress. The hunger for real elections - and real elected leaders - is out there and growing, even in countries like Saudi Arabia, where political gatherings are generally illegal and outright criticism of the royal family can bring a prison sentence. As tyrants across the world have learned, once the power of democracy is unleashed, it cannot be easily stifled. Saudi citizens, tossed a tiny scrap from the banquet of democracy, will crave more.2005-02-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|