Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Michael Young - Hizballah gains nothing by tarnishing its credibility with other Lebanese communities because of Syrian priorities. To defend its regional ambitions, Hizballah must preserve a Syrian-dominated Lebanese order, even if doing so alienates the clear majority of Lebanese who believe Syria must go; or it can side with that majority, which means abandoning Syria and its own regional objectives. The party can undeniably bring out many supporters, as it did Tuesday, but it has also discredited itself by so effectively defending Syrian hegemony over Lebanon. Hizballah must now decide whether to take its chances as a national party in a Lebanon free of Syrian domination, or risk losing all that it has built up by becoming Syria's unwelcome enforcer. The writer is the opinion editor of The Daily Star in Lebanon. 2005-03-09 00:00:00Full Article
Can Hizballah Go Straight?
(New York Times) Michael Young - Hizballah gains nothing by tarnishing its credibility with other Lebanese communities because of Syrian priorities. To defend its regional ambitions, Hizballah must preserve a Syrian-dominated Lebanese order, even if doing so alienates the clear majority of Lebanese who believe Syria must go; or it can side with that majority, which means abandoning Syria and its own regional objectives. The party can undeniably bring out many supporters, as it did Tuesday, but it has also discredited itself by so effectively defending Syrian hegemony over Lebanon. Hizballah must now decide whether to take its chances as a national party in a Lebanon free of Syrian domination, or risk losing all that it has built up by becoming Syria's unwelcome enforcer. The writer is the opinion editor of The Daily Star in Lebanon. 2005-03-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|