Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Daily Star-Lebanon) Michael Young - Not only is there no desire in Lebanon, even among many in the Shiite community, to bear the potentially devastating consequences of continued conflict with Israel; there is also no consensus to continue providing Hizballah with the cover it needs to pursue a regional agenda that might harm broader Lebanese interests. The most the party should expect once the Syrians leave is a refusal on the part of all Lebanese religious communities to sign a separate peace treaty with Israel; beyond that, the bets are off. Hizballah would do well to avoid hitching its fortunes to the sinking Syrian ship. Despite the party's demonstration on Tuesday, the national consensus in Lebanon is clearly behind a complete end to Syrian hegemony. Hizballah's destiny is a Lebanese one, and must be negotiated with all other Lebanese communities. If that means the party must one day peacefully disarm, so be it. Lebanese society is under no obligation to accept permanent revolution and open-ended Syrian domination just so Hizballah can remain regionally relevant. 2005-03-11 00:00:00Full Article
Must Lebanon Pay for Hizballah's Pride?
(Daily Star-Lebanon) Michael Young - Not only is there no desire in Lebanon, even among many in the Shiite community, to bear the potentially devastating consequences of continued conflict with Israel; there is also no consensus to continue providing Hizballah with the cover it needs to pursue a regional agenda that might harm broader Lebanese interests. The most the party should expect once the Syrians leave is a refusal on the part of all Lebanese religious communities to sign a separate peace treaty with Israel; beyond that, the bets are off. Hizballah would do well to avoid hitching its fortunes to the sinking Syrian ship. Despite the party's demonstration on Tuesday, the national consensus in Lebanon is clearly behind a complete end to Syrian hegemony. Hizballah's destiny is a Lebanese one, and must be negotiated with all other Lebanese communities. If that means the party must one day peacefully disarm, so be it. Lebanese society is under no obligation to accept permanent revolution and open-ended Syrian domination just so Hizballah can remain regionally relevant. 2005-03-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|