Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Wall Street Journal] Bret Stephens - In August 2002, an Iranian opposition group revealed that Iran had an undeclared uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and an undeclared heavy water facility at Arak - both previously unknown to the U.S. intelligence community. Since then, the U.S. has labored to persuade the international community that all these facilities have no conceivable purpose other than a military one. Those efforts paid off in successive UN Security Council resolutions demanding Iran suspend enrichment because it was "concerned by the proliferation risks" it posed. Along comes the NIE to instantly undo four years of diplomacy, using a semantic sleight-of-hand to suggest some kind of distinction can be drawn between Iran's bid to master the nuclear fuel cycle and its efforts to build nuclear weapons. It's certainly plausible Tehran may have suspended one aspect of the program - the aspect that is the least technically challenging and that, if exposed, would offer smoking-gun proof of ill intent. 2007-12-11 01:00:00Full Article
The National Intelligence Estimate Fantasy
[Wall Street Journal] Bret Stephens - In August 2002, an Iranian opposition group revealed that Iran had an undeclared uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and an undeclared heavy water facility at Arak - both previously unknown to the U.S. intelligence community. Since then, the U.S. has labored to persuade the international community that all these facilities have no conceivable purpose other than a military one. Those efforts paid off in successive UN Security Council resolutions demanding Iran suspend enrichment because it was "concerned by the proliferation risks" it posed. Along comes the NIE to instantly undo four years of diplomacy, using a semantic sleight-of-hand to suggest some kind of distinction can be drawn between Iran's bid to master the nuclear fuel cycle and its efforts to build nuclear weapons. It's certainly plausible Tehran may have suspended one aspect of the program - the aspect that is the least technically challenging and that, if exposed, would offer smoking-gun proof of ill intent. 2007-12-11 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|